Feeding practices and Jaw Development: A Comprehensive Literature Review of Their Interconnected Dynamics
Objective: Nutritive sucking plays a crucial role in infant growth and craniofacial development. This review examines the impact of breastfeeding, bottle-feeding, and non-nutritive sucking on jaw development and the risk of malocclusion, with a focus on early feeding practices, weaning and food consistency. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across several databases, including PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Web of Knowledge. Studies involving human subjects published in English were selected. The review included observational studies, cross-sectional studies and clinical trials. Keywords used in the search included "nutritive sucking," "jaw development" and "malocclusion." Results: The findings showed that breastfeeding promotes optimal jaw development and reduces malocclusion risks by engaging oral muscles. Bottle-feeding, including a more passive sucking action, does not provide the same benefits and is associated with misalignments like crossbite and open bite. Non-nutritive sucking habits, such as pacifier use and thumbsucking, further contribute to malocclusion. The consistency of foods during weaning also plays a role, with harder foods encouraging jaw muscle development, while soft foods may hinder proper growth. Conclusions: Breastfeeding supports healthy craniofacial development and lowers the risk of malocclusions. Bottle-feeding and non-nutritive sucking behaviours are linked to jaw misalignments. Early feeding practices, weaning and food texture are critical factors in jaw health and should be considered in craniofacial development strategies.
Authors
- Vasiliki Boka (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0793-4730)
- Maria-Despina Karadimitriou
- Nikoleta Kagioglou
- Angeliki Sofia Trimeridou
Publication Details
- Journal
- Dental Research and Oral Health
- Published
- 2025-03-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.26502/droh.0088
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.47