A plea for open source greenhouse climate modelling

Process based modelling of the greenhouse climate and crop has been used for over 40 years to study, design, and control greenhouse cropping systems. In recent years, a multitude of new models has been developed, but many of these newly developed models are essentially copies of legacy models that were developed in the 1990s. A question that arises is why this is the case. We argue that a lack of transparency and a culture of closed science practices leads to a repetitive habit of reinventing the wheel. An analysis of published models, both from recent years and from previous decades, shows that model reuse is often confined to the limits of isolated research groups. This is especially true for large models that incorporate new and complex climate control equipment and energy saving techniques. At the same time, the greenhouse sector is undergoing rapid development and facing momentous challenges. Process-based modelling can provide key insights and help address these challenges, but essential resources are being lost to re-coding and re-programming old models. We suggest that a collaborative research culture in greenhouse modelling – one that fosters free software, open source code, open data and shared benchmarks – is essential for the field to keep up with new developments and address current and future challenges.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Horticulturae
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2025.1425.40
Primary Topic
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A plea for open source greenhouse climate modelling

David Katzin, E.J. van Henten, S. van Mourik, L.F.M. Marcelis
Acta Horticulturae
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
article

A plea for open source greenhouse climate modelling

David Katzin, E.J. van Henten, S. van Mourik, L.F.M. Marcelis
article en

Abstract

Process based modelling of the greenhouse climate and crop has been used for over 40 years to study, design, and control greenhouse cropping systems. In recent years, a multitude of new models has been developed, but many of these newly developed models are essentially copies of legacy models that were developed in the 1990s. A question that arises is why this is the case. We argue that a lack of transparency and a culture of closed science practices leads to a repetitive habit of reinventing the wheel. An analysis of published models, both from recent years and from previous decades, shows that model reuse is often confined to the limits of isolated research groups. This is especially true for large models that incorporate new and complex climate control equipment and energy saving techniques. At the same time, the greenhouse sector is undergoing rapid development and facing momentous challenges. Process-based modelling can provide key insights and help address these challenges, but essential resources are being lost to re-coding and re-programming old models. We suggest that a collaborative research culture in greenhouse modelling – one that fosters free software, open source code, open data and shared benchmarks – is essential for the field to keep up with new developments and address current and future challenges.

Acta Horticulturae(1425)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.