Factors Predicting Myocardial Recovery After Hospitalization for De Novo Heart Failure with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Results from the COMFE Registry

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Patients hospitalized for de novo heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) may experience improvement in left ventricular function, a phenomenon associated with improved morbidity and mortality outcomes. However, the factors influencing this improvement remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between clinical and therapeutic factors and short-term improvement or recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients hospitalized with newly diagnosed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). <b>Methods</b>: This was a prospective observational study conducted in two referral centers in Spain. All patients admitted with de novo HFrEF between March 2021 and December 2023 were included. Improved myocardial function (HFimpEF) was defined as an initial LVEF ≤ 40% and a follow-up echocardiogram showing LVEF > 40%, with an increase of ≥10 points from baseline. <b>Results</b>: In total, 157 patients (63.3%) met the criteria for HFimpEF. Among the various etiologies of heart failure, significant differences were found between groups for tachycardiomyopathy (HFimpEF: 29.3% vs. non-HFimpEF: 13.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.006), valvular (HFimpEF: 7.6% vs. non-HFimpEF: 1.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.05), and ischemic (HFimpEF: 17.2% vs. non-HFimpEF: 43.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) etiologies. Multivariate analysis showed that non-ischemic etiologies significantly favored myocardial improvement compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy. NT-proBNP values were consistently higher in the non-HFimpEF group at all time points measured with statistically significant differences, except at admission. Event-free survival curves (hospitalization for HF, worsening HF, and all-cause mortality) diverged early, showing statistically significant differences between groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: Overall, 63% of patients hospitalized for de novo HFrEF achieved myocardial improvement within an average of 3-4 months, with improvement favored by valvular and tachycardiomyopathy etiologies. This improvement has a significant prognostic impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13051143
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Predicting Myocardial Recovery After Hospitalization for De Novo Heart Failure with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Results from the COMFE Registry

David García‐Vega, Julia Martínez Solé, Borja Guerrero Cervera, Víctor José Donoso Trenado et al.
1 citations
Biomedicines
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
1.39
article

Factors Predicting Myocardial Recovery After Hospitalization for De Novo Heart Failure with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Results from the COMFE Registry

David García‐Vega, Julia Martínez Solé, Borja Guerrero Cervera, Víctor José Donoso Trenado, José Ramón González‐Juanatey, Luis Martínez‐Dolz, Luis Almenar‐Bonet, Óscar Otero García, Inés Gómez‐Otero, Pablo González-López, Raquel López‐Vilella, Carlos Yebra-Pimentel Brea, Javier Adarraga Gómez, Guillermo Gallego-Latorre, Sara Huélamo-Montoro
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Patients hospitalized for de novo heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) may experience improvement in left ventricular function, a phenomenon associated with improved morbidity and mortality outcomes. However, the factors influencing this improvement remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between clinical and therapeutic factors and short-term improvement or recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients hospitalized with newly diagnosed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). <b>Methods</b>: This was a prospective observational study conducted in two referral centers in Spain. All patients admitted with de novo HFrEF between March 2021 and December 2023 were included. Improved myocardial function (HFimpEF) was defined as an initial LVEF ≤ 40% and a follow-up echocardiogram showing LVEF > 40%, with an increase of ≥10 points from baseline. <b>Results</b>: In total, 157 patients (63.3%) met the criteria for HFimpEF. Among the various etiologies of heart failure, significant differences were found between groups for tachycardiomyopathy (HFimpEF: 29.3% vs. non-HFimpEF: 13.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.006), valvular (HFimpEF: 7.6% vs. non-HFimpEF: 1.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.05), and ischemic (HFimpEF: 17.2% vs. non-HFimpEF: 43.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) etiologies. Multivariate analysis showed that non-ischemic etiologies significantly favored myocardial improvement compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy. NT-proBNP values were consistently higher in the non-HFimpEF group at all time points measured with statistically significant differences, except at admission. Event-free survival curves (hospitalization for HF, worsening HF, and all-cause mortality) diverged early, showing statistically significant differences between groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: Overall, 63% of patients hospitalized for de novo HFrEF achieved myocardial improvement within an average of 3-4 months, with improvement favored by valvular and tachycardiomyopathy etiologies. This improvement has a significant prognostic impact.

BiomedicinesVol. 13(5)
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe (ES), Centro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (ES), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.