Chatgpt vs traditional pedagogy: a comparative study in urological learning
ChatGPT loses its potential if used without a previous background. The limits of scientific reliability persist and a teacher-guided method is still essential. ChatGPT + traditional lecture gives more effective results than the single traditional lecture also allowing a better use of the chatbot.
Authors
- Sara De Santis
- Luca Sessa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-4792)
- Mario Vitale (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4583-5971)
- Luigi Schips (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7396-233X)
- Michele Marchioni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1702-4127)
- Marta Di Nicola (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1748-1931)
- Angelo Orsini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9372-5847)
- Flavia Tamborino
- Rossella Cicchetti
- Martina Basconi
- Alessio Digiacomo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9312-2266)
- Guglielmo Dello Stritto
- Gaetano Salzano
- Peppino Lannutti
- Riccardo De Archangelis
- Ludovica Spadano
Institutions
- University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
- Società Italiana di Cardiologia (IT)
- Ospedale SS. Annunziata (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- World Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2025-05-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05654-w
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.62
Funders
- Università degli Studi G. d'Annunzio Chieti - Pescara