The Paradox of Women's Protection: Why Women's Rights Remain Vulnerable in Cameroon Despite Legal Commitments

Despite advancements in legal frameworks and gender equality discourse, women in Cameroon continue to face widespread rights violations, including Female Genital Mutilation, sexual abuse, child marriage, and harmful traditional practices. This persists despite Cameroon’s ratification of international instruments like CEDAW and the Maputo Protocol, raising concerns about the effectiveness of national legal and institutional responses. This study assesses the adequacy of Cameroon’s legal framework—specifically the Constitution, Penal Code, and Civil Code in addressing violence against women. Using a qualitative-descriptive approach with document and normative legal analysis, the research draws on primary legal texts and secondary sources such as institutional reports and academic literature. The findings reveal a significant gap between legal commitments and enforcement, highlighting the absence of a comprehensive law on violence against women and persistent societal and institutional barriers. The study calls for stronger legal reforms, improved implementation, and greater public awareness to ensure effective protection of women’s rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
QURU’ Journal of Family Law and Culture
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59698/quru.v3i2.366
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Paradox of Women's Protection: Why Women's Rights Remain Vulnerable in Cameroon Despite Legal Commitments

Nana Charles Nguindip
QURU’ Journal of Family Law and Culture
Human Rights and Development
article

The Paradox of Women's Protection: Why Women's Rights Remain Vulnerable in Cameroon Despite Legal Commitments

Nana Charles Nguindip
article en

Abstract

Despite advancements in legal frameworks and gender equality discourse, women in Cameroon continue to face widespread rights violations, including Female Genital Mutilation, sexual abuse, child marriage, and harmful traditional practices. This persists despite Cameroon’s ratification of international instruments like CEDAW and the Maputo Protocol, raising concerns about the effectiveness of national legal and institutional responses. This study assesses the adequacy of Cameroon’s legal framework—specifically the Constitution, Penal Code, and Civil Code in addressing violence against women. Using a qualitative-descriptive approach with document and normative legal analysis, the research draws on primary legal texts and secondary sources such as institutional reports and academic literature. The findings reveal a significant gap between legal commitments and enforcement, highlighting the absence of a comprehensive law on violence against women and persistent societal and institutional barriers. The study calls for stronger legal reforms, improved implementation, and greater public awareness to ensure effective protection of women’s rights.

QURU’ Journal of Family Law and CultureVol. 3(2)
Université de Dschang (CM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Human Rights and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Paradox of Women's Protection: Why Women's Rights Remain Vulnerable in Cameroon Despite Legal Commitments — Nana Charles Nguindip · QURU’ Journal of Family Law and Culture (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS