Pill Shape Determines Esophageal Transit Times—A Pill‐to‐Pill Study

ABSTRACT Objective When manufacturing medications, several parameters are considered in pill design, particularly shape and size. We hypothesized that oval‐shaped pills would transit more quickly through the esophagus than round pills. Methods Esophageal transit time (pill) (ETTp) of round and oval barium dummy‐pills, derived from VFSS in 112 healthy individuals with no swallowing complaints and 50 individuals referred with swallowing complaints, was compared. ETTp was measured using quantitative software. Results ETTp differed significantly by shape. In healthy adults, median round (13 mm, 1 g) ETTp was 26.4 s (SD 23.6) compared to oval ETTp (13 mm long axis, 1 g) of 5.4 s (SD 4) [ p < 0.001]. In those with swallowing complaints, round ETTp was 45 s (SD 44) vs. oval ETTp 9 s (SD 14) [ p < 0.001]. Gender and age differed across groups, with normal oval pill swallowers younger and more likely to be female than those with swallow complaints (39 vs. 69 years, p < 0.001; 70% female vs. 31% female, p = 0.018). Conclusions Medication shape affects ETTp, with oval‐shaped pills traveling significantly faster through the esophagus than round pills. However, oval‐shaped pills do not highlight abnormality in the esophagus to the same degree as a round pill. Therefore, consideration of the purpose of pill administration during VFSS should guide pill shape choice, with round pills most suited for diagnostic testing. In a clinical setting, oval‐shaped medication should be favored, if possible, for those with compromised swallow ability. Level of Evidence 3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32266
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pill Shape Determines Esophageal Transit Times—A Pill‐to‐Pill Study

Anna Miles, Jacqueline Allen, Georgia Mackay
The Laryngoscope
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

Pill Shape Determines Esophageal Transit Times—A Pill‐to‐Pill Study

Anna Miles, Jacqueline Allen, Georgia Mackay
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective When manufacturing medications, several parameters are considered in pill design, particularly shape and size. We hypothesized that oval‐shaped pills would transit more quickly through the esophagus than round pills. Methods Esophageal transit time (pill) (ETTp) of round and oval barium dummy‐pills, derived from VFSS in 112 healthy individuals with no swallowing complaints and 50 individuals referred with swallowing complaints, was compared. ETTp was measured using quantitative software. Results ETTp differed significantly by shape. In healthy adults, median round (13 mm, 1 g) ETTp was 26.4 s (SD 23.6) compared to oval ETTp (13 mm long axis, 1 g) of 5.4 s (SD 4) [ p < 0.001]. In those with swallowing complaints, round ETTp was 45 s (SD 44) vs. oval ETTp 9 s (SD 14) [ p < 0.001]. Gender and age differed across groups, with normal oval pill swallowers younger and more likely to be female than those with swallow complaints (39 vs. 69 years, p < 0.001; 70% female vs. 31% female, p = 0.018). Conclusions Medication shape affects ETTp, with oval‐shaped pills traveling significantly faster through the esophagus than round pills. However, oval‐shaped pills do not highlight abnormality in the esophagus to the same degree as a round pill. Therefore, consideration of the purpose of pill administration during VFSS should guide pill shape choice, with round pills most suited for diagnostic testing. In a clinical setting, oval‐shaped medication should be favored, if possible, for those with compromised swallow ability. Level of Evidence 3.

The LaryngoscopeVol. 135(10)
University of Auckland (NZ), North Shore Hospital (NZ)
University of Auckland
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.