The Future of Psychosocial Supports in Australia– Are the Recommendations from the National Disability Insurance Scheme Review the Answer?

The introduction of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) in 2013 and the resulting changes in mainstream funding for psychosocial supports have led to disparities in funding between the two existing systems. Currently, people supported under the NDIS receive significantly more funding compared to those supported through federal and state programs. The NDIS review has highlighted this inequity, prompting a commitment to increase state and federal funding for foundational psychosocial supports. However, the specifics of this funding remain unclear. This article synthesises and critically evaluates the recent NDIS review recommendations relating to psychosocial disability and makes recommendations on how both systems could be enhanced to ensure equitable and accessible psychosocial support provision in Australia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-025-01467-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Future of Psychosocial Supports in Australia– Are the Recommendations from the National Disability Insurance Scheme Review the Answer?

Megan Rattray, Tania Shelby‐James
1 citations
Community Mental Health Journal
Healthcare innovation and challenges
8.93
article

The Future of Psychosocial Supports in Australia– Are the Recommendations from the National Disability Insurance Scheme Review the Answer?

Megan Rattray, Tania Shelby‐James
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The introduction of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) in 2013 and the resulting changes in mainstream funding for psychosocial supports have led to disparities in funding between the two existing systems. Currently, people supported under the NDIS receive significantly more funding compared to those supported through federal and state programs. The NDIS review has highlighted this inequity, prompting a commitment to increase state and federal funding for foundational psychosocial supports. However, the specifics of this funding remain unclear. This article synthesises and critically evaluates the recent NDIS review recommendations relating to psychosocial disability and makes recommendations on how both systems could be enhanced to ensure equitable and accessible psychosocial support provision in Australia.

Community Mental Health JournalVol. 61(7)
Flinders University (AU)
University of New South Wales
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Healthcare innovation and challenges
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.