Assessing the Desirability of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 in Manipur and Nagaland

Specifically, the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 (AFSPA) enacted originally to quell insurgencies allows Indian security forces to work with minimal local oversight in “disturbed areas” declared under the act. Posing as a critical evaluation of AFSPA’s continued implementation in Manipur and Nagaland, the regions have been plagued by protracted conflict and socio-political instability, this article provides an analysis upon the rights of Afro Indians living in Manipur and the role AFSPA played in curtailing basic civic and political rights granted to them. The analysis employed a qualitative doctrinal research methodology that uses constitutional provisions, judicial pronouncements, scholarly literature, human rights bodies reports. It comes to light that AFSPA’s provisions (i.e. to use lethal force, make warrantless arrest etc) violate constitutional guarantees and international human rights standards. Severe implications are also found such as entrenched militarization of governance, escalation of ethnic tensions, systematic abuse of human rights and eroding of faith in democratic institutions. Despite efforts undertaken by the judiciary to mitigate the abuses, AFSPA continues to promote cycles of violence, underwrites democracy, and does little to address any cause of the insurgency. The argument for all-out reform or repeal of AFSPA is compelling; instead this research calls for alternatives in the conflict resolution framework centred on human rights, responsibility and community led governance. AFSPA, however, is completely incompatible with contemporary democratic values and human rights norm. It needs to be reconsidered at the earliest.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i03.44013
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Desirability of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 in Manipur and Nagaland

Chamshel Dilbung
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
article

Assessing the Desirability of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 in Manipur and Nagaland

Chamshel Dilbung
article en

Abstract

Specifically, the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 (AFSPA) enacted originally to quell insurgencies allows Indian security forces to work with minimal local oversight in “disturbed areas” declared under the act. Posing as a critical evaluation of AFSPA’s continued implementation in Manipur and Nagaland, the regions have been plagued by protracted conflict and socio-political instability, this article provides an analysis upon the rights of Afro Indians living in Manipur and the role AFSPA played in curtailing basic civic and political rights granted to them. The analysis employed a qualitative doctrinal research methodology that uses constitutional provisions, judicial pronouncements, scholarly literature, human rights bodies reports. It comes to light that AFSPA’s provisions (i.e. to use lethal force, make warrantless arrest etc) violate constitutional guarantees and international human rights standards. Severe implications are also found such as entrenched militarization of governance, escalation of ethnic tensions, systematic abuse of human rights and eroding of faith in democratic institutions. Despite efforts undertaken by the judiciary to mitigate the abuses, AFSPA continues to promote cycles of violence, underwrites democracy, and does little to address any cause of the insurgency. The argument for all-out reform or repeal of AFSPA is compelling; instead this research calls for alternatives in the conflict resolution framework centred on human rights, responsibility and community led governance. AFSPA, however, is completely incompatible with contemporary democratic values and human rights norm. It needs to be reconsidered at the earliest.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.