Subsidies against Nature: A multidimensional framework for biodiversity-aligned national budgets

Governments provide more than USD 800 billion annually in environmentally harmful subsidies at the global level despite international commitments. This paper introduces a novel and replicable framework for identifying biodiversity-harmful subsidies within national budgets. Our multidimensional approach is based on the five drivers of biodiversity loss: land use change, resource exploitation, climate change, pollution, and invasive species. Our framework evaluates subsidies across seven economic sectors — transport, housing, industry, agriculture, livestock, power generation, and digital deployment— based on their expected biodiversity impact (harmful, positive, mixed, neutral, or unclassifiable). We apply this framework to the French national budget and find that, in 2022, €27.14 billion were allocated to subsidize harmful activities. Pollution is the most financially supported driver of biodiversity loss. Our analysis also reveals significant trade-offs, with 25% of climate-positive subsidies exacerbating land use pressures. The study calls for a sector-specific approach to subsidy reform. By codeveloping this framework with biodiversity experts and public authorities, we provide a decision-support tool to align public investments with pathways towards sustainability. • We develop a replicable framework to identify harmful subsidies for biodiversity. • Subsidies for transport, housing, and power generation are most likely to contribute to biodiversity loss in France. • Pollution is the most subsidized driver of biodiversity loss. • The assessment of harmfulness is based on the alignment with transition scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108661
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subsidies against Nature: A multidimensional framework for biodiversity-aligned national budgets

Vincent Deschamps, Louise Dupuis, Harold Levrel, Améline Vallet et al.
2 citations
Ecological Economics
Economic and Environmental Valuation
6.26
article

Subsidies against Nature: A multidimensional framework for biodiversity-aligned national budgets

Vincent Deschamps, Louise Dupuis, Harold Levrel, Améline Vallet, Hélène Soubelet, Morgane Gonon, Aurélien Oosterlinck, Amélie Le Mieux
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Governments provide more than USD 800 billion annually in environmentally harmful subsidies at the global level despite international commitments. This paper introduces a novel and replicable framework for identifying biodiversity-harmful subsidies within national budgets. Our multidimensional approach is based on the five drivers of biodiversity loss: land use change, resource exploitation, climate change, pollution, and invasive species. Our framework evaluates subsidies across seven economic sectors — transport, housing, industry, agriculture, livestock, power generation, and digital deployment— based on their expected biodiversity impact (harmful, positive, mixed, neutral, or unclassifiable). We apply this framework to the French national budget and find that, in 2022, €27.14 billion were allocated to subsidize harmful activities. Pollution is the most financially supported driver of biodiversity loss. Our analysis also reveals significant trade-offs, with 25% of climate-positive subsidies exacerbating land use pressures. The study calls for a sector-specific approach to subsidy reform. By codeveloping this framework with biodiversity experts and public authorities, we provide a decision-support tool to align public investments with pathways towards sustainability. • We develop a replicable framework to identify harmful subsidies for biodiversity. • Subsidies for transport, housing, and power generation are most likely to contribute to biodiversity loss in France. • Pollution is the most subsidized driver of biodiversity loss. • The assessment of harmfulness is based on the alignment with transition scenarios.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 235
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), École nationale des ponts et chaussées (FR), Ecologie, Société, Evolution (FR), French National Agency for Water and Aquatic Environments (FR), Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité (FR)
Office Français de la Biodiversité
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.