On Estimating the Strength of Differentially Private Mechanisms in a Black-Box Setting

We analyze to what extent final users can infer information about the level of protection of their data when the data obfuscation mechanism is a priori unknown to them (the so-called “black-box” scenario). In particular, we explore four notions of differential privacy, namely local/central "-DP/Renyi- ´ DP. On the one hand, we prove that, without any assumption on the underlying distributions, it is not possible to have an algorithm able to infer the level of data protection with provable guarantees. On the other hand, we demonstrate that, under reasonable assumptions (namely Lipschitzness of the involved densities on a closed interval), such guarantees exist for the local versions and can be achieved by a simple histogrambased estimator. We validate our results experimentally and note that, in two particularly well behaved distributions (namely the Laplace and the Gaussian noise), our method performs better than expected, in the sense that in practice the number of samples needed to achieve the desired confidence is smaller than the theoretical bound, and the estimate of ∊ is more precise than predicted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tdsc.2025.3568160
Primary Topic
Metallurgy and Material Forming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Estimating the Strength of Differentially Private Mechanisms in a Black-Box Setting

Federica Granese, Daniele Gorla, Pablo Piantanida, Louis Jalouzot et al.
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
Metallurgy and Material Forming
article

On Estimating the Strength of Differentially Private Mechanisms in a Black-Box Setting

Federica Granese, Daniele Gorla, Pablo Piantanida, Louis Jalouzot, Catuscia Palamidessi
article en

Abstract

We analyze to what extent final users can infer information about the level of protection of their data when the data obfuscation mechanism is a priori unknown to them (the so-called “black-box” scenario). In particular, we explore four notions of differential privacy, namely local/central "-DP/Renyi- ´ DP. On the one hand, we prove that, without any assumption on the underlying distributions, it is not possible to have an algorithm able to infer the level of data protection with provable guarantees. On the other hand, we demonstrate that, under reasonable assumptions (namely Lipschitzness of the involved densities on a closed interval), such guarantees exist for the local versions and can be achieved by a simple histogrambased estimator. We validate our results experimentally and note that, in two particularly well behaved distributions (namely the Laplace and the Gaussian noise), our method performs better than expected, in the sense that in practice the number of samples needed to achieve the desired confidence is smaller than the theoretical bound, and the estimate of ∊ is more precise than predicted.

IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure ComputingVol. 22(5)
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (FR), X-Fab (Germany) (DE), Sorbonne Université (FR), Laboratoire d'Informatique de l'École Polytechnique (FR), Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Metallurgy and Material Forming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.