Perbandingan Algoritma LBP dan Cascading LBP-GLCM untuk Ekstraksi Fitur pada Citra Beras

This study compares two image feature extraction algorithms: Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) and a combination of Local Binary Pattern with GLCM (LBP GLCM), for rice image classification. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of both methods in generating features such as ASM, contrast, correlation, entropy, and energy, as well as to measure the computational time. The results show that the LBP GLCM algorithm significantly improves classification accuracy compared to pure GLCM, but requires 13-17 times longer computational time. While GLCM is more efficient in terms of time, its classification accuracy is relatively lower. These findings align with previous studies indicating that adding LBP to GLCM enhances classification performance. In conclusion, LBP GLCM is superior in accuracy, making it a better choice for applications that prioritize precise classification results. However, the trade-off in computational time should be considered, especially for applications requiring fast processing. These findings are relevant for further development in agriculture and image processing.Â

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
KOMPUTEK
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24269/jkt.v8i2.2962
Primary Topic
Computer Science and Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perbandingan Algoritma LBP dan Cascading LBP-GLCM untuk Ekstraksi Fitur pada Citra Beras

Febriyanti Darnis, Arief Rahman, Yulian Ansori
KOMPUTEK
Computer Science and Engineering
article

Perbandingan Algoritma LBP dan Cascading LBP-GLCM untuk Ekstraksi Fitur pada Citra Beras

Febriyanti Darnis, Arief Rahman, Yulian Ansori
article en

Abstract

This study compares two image feature extraction algorithms: Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) and a combination of Local Binary Pattern with GLCM (LBP GLCM), for rice image classification. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of both methods in generating features such as ASM, contrast, correlation, entropy, and energy, as well as to measure the computational time. The results show that the LBP GLCM algorithm significantly improves classification accuracy compared to pure GLCM, but requires 13-17 times longer computational time. While GLCM is more efficient in terms of time, its classification accuracy is relatively lower. These findings align with previous studies indicating that adding LBP to GLCM enhances classification performance. In conclusion, LBP GLCM is superior in accuracy, making it a better choice for applications that prioritize precise classification results. However, the trade-off in computational time should be considered, especially for applications requiring fast processing. These findings are relevant for further development in agriculture and image processing.Â

KOMPUTEKVol. 8(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Computer Science and Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.