Competitive dynamics in family firms: Transactional versus communal approaches

Family business scholarship has neglected the dynamics of competitive rivalry, while competitive dynamics scholars have ignored the familial drivers shaping the competitive behavior of family firms. We bridge competitive dynamics and socioemotional literatures to model family firm competitive behavior. Family firms whose owners prioritize generational involvement as a source of socioemotional wealth often favor long-term, stakeholder-oriented communal competition . By contrast, owners favoring ongoing economic benefits for relatives may favor short-term, family-centric transactional competition . We develop propositions differentiating these competitive models in core characteristics, draw implications for the classic AMC (awareness, motivation, capability) model of competitive attack and response, and propose contrasting competitive action repertoires. We conclude that socioemotional priorities within family firms have important implications for competitive interaction and suggest a rethinking of current views of competitive dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Business Strategy
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2025.100668
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Family Business Performance and Succession
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competitive dynamics in family firms: Transactional versus communal approaches

Isabelle Le Breton‐Miller, Danny Miller
3 citations
Journal of Family Business Strategy
Family Business Performance and Succession
8.29
article

Competitive dynamics in family firms: Transactional versus communal approaches

Isabelle Le Breton‐Miller, Danny Miller
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Family business scholarship has neglected the dynamics of competitive rivalry, while competitive dynamics scholars have ignored the familial drivers shaping the competitive behavior of family firms. We bridge competitive dynamics and socioemotional literatures to model family firm competitive behavior. Family firms whose owners prioritize generational involvement as a source of socioemotional wealth often favor long-term, stakeholder-oriented communal competition . By contrast, owners favoring ongoing economic benefits for relatives may favor short-term, family-centric transactional competition . We develop propositions differentiating these competitive models in core characteristics, draw implications for the classic AMC (awareness, motivation, capability) model of competitive attack and response, and propose contrasting competitive action repertoires. We conclude that socioemotional priorities within family firms have important implications for competitive interaction and suggest a rethinking of current views of competitive dynamics.

Journal of Family Business StrategyVol. 16(2)
HEC Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Family Business Performance and Succession
8.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.