Unveiling pervasive assumptions: moving beyond the poverty-biodiversity loss association in conservation

This paper reflects on the continued persistence of the idea in conservation research and practice that poverty drives biodiversity loss (the poverty-biodiversity loss association [PBLA]). We draw on evidence to show how the PBLA has proven resistant to counter-evidence and is particularly visible at local-level implementation, and is often implicit in conservation strategies. We untangle three underlying reasons that help to explain why the PBLA has persisted under a verisimilitude (seeming truth) that can leave it hiding in plain sight. In doing so, we offer conservation science and practice the means to recognise and thereby remedy this thinking where it exists, and in so doing, advance conservation towards its aims of equitable and effective delivery. We outline how the Connected Conservation model may be better equipped to challenge the disproportionate role of wealth in biodiversity decline whilst empowering biodiversity stewards and their plural knowledge, values and governance systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101537
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling pervasive assumptions: moving beyond the poverty-biodiversity loss association in conservation

Natalia Estrada-Carmona, Christina C. Hicks, Jos Barlow, Mairon G. Bastos Lima et al.
3 citations
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
3.32
article

Unveiling pervasive assumptions: moving beyond the poverty-biodiversity loss association in conservation

Natalia Estrada-Carmona, Christina C. Hicks, Jos Barlow, Mairon G. Bastos Lima, Esther Turnhout, Unai Pascual, Nathalie Pettorelli, Alexander Charles Lees, James Reed, Evan Killick, Eric Djomo Nana, Rachel Carmenta, Neil Dawson, Adrian Martin, Bhaskar Vira, Giorgos Kallis, Julie G. Zaehringer, Shofwan Al Banna Choiruzzad
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper reflects on the continued persistence of the idea in conservation research and practice that poverty drives biodiversity loss (the poverty-biodiversity loss association [PBLA]). We draw on evidence to show how the PBLA has proven resistant to counter-evidence and is particularly visible at local-level implementation, and is often implicit in conservation strategies. We untangle three underlying reasons that help to explain why the PBLA has persisted under a verisimilitude (seeming truth) that can leave it hiding in plain sight. In doing so, we offer conservation science and practice the means to recognise and thereby remedy this thinking where it exists, and in so doing, advance conservation towards its aims of equitable and effective delivery. We outline how the Connected Conservation model may be better equipped to challenge the disproportionate role of wealth in biodiversity decline whilst empowering biodiversity stewards and their plural knowledge, values and governance systems.

Current Opinion in Environmental SustainabilityVol. 74
University of Bern (CH), Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Zoological Society of London (GB), University of Sussex (GB), University of the Basque Country (ES), Agropolis International (FR), University of Manchester (GB), University of Indonesia (ID), Basque Centre for Climate Change (ES), Tyndall Centre (GB), Conservation Leadership Programme (GB), Science Oxford (GB), Stockholm Environment Institute (SE), Lancaster University (GB), Center for International Forestry Research (ID), University of Twente (NL)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.