Evaluation of marginal infiltration by varying the adhesive protocol
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sealing of composite resin restorations, observing marginal infiltration through a conventional resin by varying the adhesive technique. Materials and Methods: Cavity preparations were performed on the buccal and lingual surfaces with margins at the cement-enamel junction. The samples were divided into three groups (n=10): Group 1-Selective conditioning technique; Group 2-Total conditioning technique; Group 3-Non conditioning. After, the restorations were made using conventional composite resin, immersed in methylene blue (C16H18ClN3S) for seven days and evaluated in a standardized manner, through scores, and analyzed the penetration depth of the dye. Results: The data were submitted to the Tukey test with a significance level of 5%. The results showed that the samples that were not conditioned obtained the highest infiltration rates (p=0.0001). Discussion: The integrity of the margins of a restoration is essential to clinical success, since its absence is directly related to the emergence of interface infiltrations. Conclusion: The authors concluded that the worst group was the one without etching; enamel showed less infiltration than dentin for all groups; the technique of selective etching and total etching obtained similar results regarding microleakage.
Authors
- Tereza Cristina Favieri de Melo-Silva (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5309-7190)
- Ítalo Cardoso de Carvalho (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7404-9825)
- Camila Gobbi de Carvalho Barbosa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9825-2449)
- Leonardo Costa de Souza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9872-9566)
- Rafaela Estefânio Fatigatti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2572-0764)
Institutions
- Centro Universitário de Volta Redonda (BR)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cadernos UniFOA
- Published
- 2025-05-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.47385/cadunifoa.v20.n55.5530
- Primary Topic
- Dental materials and restorations
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00