Comparative of control strategies on electrical vehicle fleet charging management strategies under uncertainties

• Mitigation of the uncertainty of users’ inputs in EV fleet charging management by diffusion model; • Mitigation of future arrivals uncertainties in EV fleet charging management by gaussian mixture model; • Comparison of three controls strategies based on model predictive control and/or data-driven techniques; The growing penetration of Electric Vehicles (EVs) in transportation brings challenges to power distribution systems due to uncertain usage patterns and increased peak loads. Effective EV fleet charging management strategies are needed to minimize network impacts, such as peak charging power. While existing studies have addressed uncertainties in future arrivals, they often overlook the uncertainties in user-provided inputs of current ongoing charging EVs, such as estimated departure time and energy demand. This paper analyzes the impact of these uncertainties and evaluates three management strategies: a baseline Model Predictive Control (MPC), a data-hybrid MPC, and a fully data-driven Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) approach. For data-hybrid MPC, we adopted a diffusion model to handle user input uncertainties and a Gaussian Mixture Model for modeling arrival/departure scenarios. Additionally, the DRL method is based on a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) to manage uncertainty and employs a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for feature extraction. Robustness tests under different user uncertainty levels show that the data hybrid MPC performs better on the baseline MPC by 20%, while the DRL-based method achieves around 10% improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and AI
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100522
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative of control strategies on electrical vehicle fleet charging management strategies under uncertainties

Nourédine Hadjsaïd, Rémy Rigo‐Mariani, Zhewei Zhang
5 citations
Energy and AI
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
3.65
article

Comparative of control strategies on electrical vehicle fleet charging management strategies under uncertainties

Nourédine Hadjsaïd, Rémy Rigo‐Mariani, Zhewei Zhang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Mitigation of the uncertainty of users’ inputs in EV fleet charging management by diffusion model; • Mitigation of future arrivals uncertainties in EV fleet charging management by gaussian mixture model; • Comparison of three controls strategies based on model predictive control and/or data-driven techniques; The growing penetration of Electric Vehicles (EVs) in transportation brings challenges to power distribution systems due to uncertain usage patterns and increased peak loads. Effective EV fleet charging management strategies are needed to minimize network impacts, such as peak charging power. While existing studies have addressed uncertainties in future arrivals, they often overlook the uncertainties in user-provided inputs of current ongoing charging EVs, such as estimated departure time and energy demand. This paper analyzes the impact of these uncertainties and evaluates three management strategies: a baseline Model Predictive Control (MPC), a data-hybrid MPC, and a fully data-driven Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) approach. For data-hybrid MPC, we adopted a diffusion model to handle user input uncertainties and a Gaussian Mixture Model for modeling arrival/departure scenarios. Additionally, the DRL method is based on a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) to manage uncertainty and employs a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for feature extraction. Robustness tests under different user uncertainty levels show that the data hybrid MPC performs better on the baseline MPC by 20%, while the DRL-based method achieves around 10% improvement.

Energy and AIVol. 21
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Laboratoire de Génie Électrique de Grenoble (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
National Research Foundation Singapore
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
3.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.