Koncepcja komunikacyjnej stratyfikacji społeczeństwa w kontekście miasta – style życia jako kody komunikacji

This article primarily proposes a different, interdisciplinary view of the city as a specific space for the manifestation of various lifestyles. The authors posit that the concept of urban lifestyles (Oliveira et al. 2020) is simply too general for understanding cities from an architectural-urban and social perspective. Furthermore, the category of the “creative class” (Florida 2003) is not so much a description of a specific lifestyle as it is a manifestation of consumption-oriented market practices. Assuming that society should be understood primarily as a system of communicative connections (Luhmann 1995), the authors indicate a possible direction for the study of lifestyles: from the perspective of their application to urban space in a way that is oriented towards the final recipient in a specific social role. Thus, it is not the human being that is the focal point of lifestyle differentiation but communications and their social manifestations. The authors look at the city and its spaces in order to juxtapose them with the concept of the communicative stratification of society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stan Rzeczy
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51196/srz.25.10
Primary Topic
Local Governance and Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Koncepcja komunikacyjnej stratyfikacji społeczeństwa w kontekście miasta – style życia jako kody komunikacji

Agnieszka Labus, Mariusz Wszołek
Stan Rzeczy
Local Governance and Planning
article

Koncepcja komunikacyjnej stratyfikacji społeczeństwa w kontekście miasta – style życia jako kody komunikacji

Agnieszka Labus, Mariusz Wszołek
article en

Abstract

This article primarily proposes a different, interdisciplinary view of the city as a specific space for the manifestation of various lifestyles. The authors posit that the concept of urban lifestyles (Oliveira et al. 2020) is simply too general for understanding cities from an architectural-urban and social perspective. Furthermore, the category of the “creative class” (Florida 2003) is not so much a description of a specific lifestyle as it is a manifestation of consumption-oriented market practices. Assuming that society should be understood primarily as a system of communicative connections (Luhmann 1995), the authors indicate a possible direction for the study of lifestyles: from the perspective of their application to urban space in a way that is oriented towards the final recipient in a specific social role. Thus, it is not the human being that is the focal point of lifestyle differentiation but communications and their social manifestations. The authors look at the city and its spaces in order to juxtapose them with the concept of the communicative stratification of society.

Stan Rzeczy(2(25))
Uniwersytet SWPS (PL), Westsächsische Hochschule Zwickau (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Local Governance and Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.