A global scale of economic left-right party positions: cross-national and cross-expert perceptions of party placements
We examine the cross-national comparability of expert placements of political partieson the economic left-right dimension using a novel dataset combining data from Europe, Latin America, Australia, Israel, Canada, and the United States. Using anchoring vignettes and Bayesian Aldrich-McKelvey Scaling (BAM), we assess evidence of geographic and expert-level differential item functioning (DIF) in how experts interpret the left-right scale. We find statistically significant but substantively small variations in how experts perceive party positions cross-nationally, particularly in terms of directional bias and the spread of their ideological placements. While the correlation between “raw” survey scores and DIF-corrected estimates is high (0.992), we observe meaningful deviations for individual parties, with larger discrepancies between rather than within regions. These results indicate that the economic left-right dimension exhibits broad consistency in expert understanding across countries, yet researchers should still exercise caution when making cross-national comparisons, particularly across regions where expert perceptions show greater variation.
Authors
- Seth Jolly (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1983-9837)
- Roi Zur (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3168-9018)
- Jonathan Polk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0125-8850)
- Nicolás de la Cerda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2474-9756)
- Jelle Koedam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0933-3288)
- Ryan Bakker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0501-6859)
- Ruth Dassonneville (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2511-0129)
- Jill Sheppard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9150-2780)
- Patrick Leslie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9218-8981)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Politics
- Published
- 2025-05-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1086/736578
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.52
Funders
- Syracuse University
- Tulane University
- University of Essex
- Lunds Universitet
- Universität Zürich