Apatite geochemistry records crustal anatexis: A case study of metapelites and granitic gneisses from the Cona area in the eastern Himalaya

Abstract Apatite is a common accessory mineral in metamorphic rocks, yet its behavior during progressive metamorphism involving extensive anatexis remains underexplored. To address this issue, we conducted petrographic and geochemical analyses of apatite in a series of amphibolite-to-granulite-facies metapelites and granitic gneisses from the Cona area, Southern Tibet, in the eastern Himalaya. These analyses were complemented by phase equilibrium modeling to characterize mineral reaction sequences during anatexis across different pressure-temperature conditions. The results indicate that the minor and trace element compositions of apatite can effectively differentiate protolith type, metamorphic grade, and anatectic mechanism. Apatites in the granitic gneisses exhibit higher F, light rare earth elements (LREE), Y, and Th contents, but lower Sr and Eu contents, as well as a lower positive slope between Cl and FeO contents in the covariant diagram, compared to those in the metapelites. These differences are attributed to variations in protolith composition and the associated mineral assemblage. In both the metapelites and granitic gneisses, apatite grain sizes increase with metamorphic grade; geochemically, apatite LREE contents, as well as its relative contributions to whole-rock LREE and middle rare earth element (MREE) contents, increase with metamorphic grade. Notably, apatites in samples subjected to biotite dehydration melting show lower FeO and MnO contents and higher TbN/LuN ratios than those in samples subjected to muscovite dehydration melting. This observation is linked to the formation of peritectic garnet during biotite dehydration melting. These variations with metamorphic grade can be ascribed to the dissolution of pre-existing LREE-rich monazite and MREE-rich apatite, coupled with the recrystallization of residual grains or new growth through incongruent melting reactions during progressive anatexis. Our findings suggest that apatite can act as both a reactant and a product during crustal anatexis, and its geochemistry can serve as an indicator of anatectic mechanisms. Several processes that were not considered in the equilibrium thermodynamic modeling, such as incongruent melting involving accessory minerals and recrystallization or Ostwald ripening under suprasolidus conditions, might enable apatite to develop larger grain sizes and capture the geochemical signatures of anatectic reactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Mineralogist
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2024-9685
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Apatite geochemistry records crustal anatexis: A case study of metapelites and granitic gneisses from the Cona area in the eastern Himalaya

Cong Tu, Min Ji, Xuan-Jin Chen, Xiao‐Ying Gao
American Mineralogist
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Apatite geochemistry records crustal anatexis: A case study of metapelites and granitic gneisses from the Cona area in the eastern Himalaya

Cong Tu, Min Ji, Xuan-Jin Chen, Xiao‐Ying Gao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Apatite is a common accessory mineral in metamorphic rocks, yet its behavior during progressive metamorphism involving extensive anatexis remains underexplored. To address this issue, we conducted petrographic and geochemical analyses of apatite in a series of amphibolite-to-granulite-facies metapelites and granitic gneisses from the Cona area, Southern Tibet, in the eastern Himalaya. These analyses were complemented by phase equilibrium modeling to characterize mineral reaction sequences during anatexis across different pressure-temperature conditions. The results indicate that the minor and trace element compositions of apatite can effectively differentiate protolith type, metamorphic grade, and anatectic mechanism. Apatites in the granitic gneisses exhibit higher F, light rare earth elements (LREE), Y, and Th contents, but lower Sr and Eu contents, as well as a lower positive slope between Cl and FeO contents in the covariant diagram, compared to those in the metapelites. These differences are attributed to variations in protolith composition and the associated mineral assemblage. In both the metapelites and granitic gneisses, apatite grain sizes increase with metamorphic grade; geochemically, apatite LREE contents, as well as its relative contributions to whole-rock LREE and middle rare earth element (MREE) contents, increase with metamorphic grade. Notably, apatites in samples subjected to biotite dehydration melting show lower FeO and MnO contents and higher TbN/LuN ratios than those in samples subjected to muscovite dehydration melting. This observation is linked to the formation of peritectic garnet during biotite dehydration melting. These variations with metamorphic grade can be ascribed to the dissolution of pre-existing LREE-rich monazite and MREE-rich apatite, coupled with the recrystallization of residual grains or new growth through incongruent melting reactions during progressive anatexis. Our findings suggest that apatite can act as both a reactant and a product during crustal anatexis, and its geochemistry can serve as an indicator of anatectic mechanisms. Several processes that were not considered in the equilibrium thermodynamic modeling, such as incongruent melting involving accessory minerals and recrystallization or Ostwald ripening under suprasolidus conditions, might enable apatite to develop larger grain sizes and capture the geochemical signatures of anatectic reactions.

American MineralogistVol. 110(12)
Twitter (United States) (US), University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Hefei Institutes of Physical Science (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.