Novel gas turbine combined cycle inlet air cooling systems integrating proton exchange membrane electrolyzer, LiBr absorption chiller, and solar energy

The power output of gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) is constrained in hot regions due to reduced compressor inlet air flow rate. In this paper, two schemes are proposed to enhance the GTCC power output by compressor inlet air cooling. In scheme 1, during nighttime, electricity from power grid is used to drive proton exchange membrane electrolyzer for producing hydrogen and hot water; during daytime, hot water is used to drive LiBr absorption chiller for compressor inlet air cooling, hydrogen is co-combusted with natural gas. In scheme 2, solar energy is further utilized to aid the absorption chiller for generating more cold energy. The proposed schemes are subject to techno-economic analysis through a case study. The results indicate, compared with the reference GTCC, the annual net power output is enhanced by 38.05 and 59.90 GWh in schemes 1 and 2. The economic analysis suggests scheme 2 outperforms scheme 1: for schemes 1 and 2, the dynamic payback periods are 10.61 and 5.62 years, with the corresponding net present value increments being 12.74 and 38.05 million USD, the levelized cost of electricity of the augmented power are 0.16 and 0.12 USD/kWh, and the levelized cost of hydrogen is 3.98 USD/(kg H 2 ). • Two schemes are proposed for GTCC power augmentation by compressor inlet air cooling. • The net present value increments of the two schemes are 12.74 and 38.05 million USD. • The dynamic payback periods of the two schemes are 10.61 and 5.62 years. • The levelized cost of electricity of the two schemes are 0.16 and 0.12 USD/kWh. • The levelized cost of hydrogen of the two schemes is 3.98 USD/(kg H 2 ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136437
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel gas turbine combined cycle inlet air cooling systems integrating proton exchange membrane electrolyzer, LiBr absorption chiller, and solar energy

Yanqiang Kong, Xiaoze Du, Lijun Yang, Guoqiang Zhang et al.
4 citations
Energy
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
2.85
article

Novel gas turbine combined cycle inlet air cooling systems integrating proton exchange membrane electrolyzer, LiBr absorption chiller, and solar energy

Yanqiang Kong, Xiaoze Du, Lijun Yang, Guoqiang Zhang, Zhidong Chen, Weijia Wang, Lei Chen, Hongwei Zhan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The power output of gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) is constrained in hot regions due to reduced compressor inlet air flow rate. In this paper, two schemes are proposed to enhance the GTCC power output by compressor inlet air cooling. In scheme 1, during nighttime, electricity from power grid is used to drive proton exchange membrane electrolyzer for producing hydrogen and hot water; during daytime, hot water is used to drive LiBr absorption chiller for compressor inlet air cooling, hydrogen is co-combusted with natural gas. In scheme 2, solar energy is further utilized to aid the absorption chiller for generating more cold energy. The proposed schemes are subject to techno-economic analysis through a case study. The results indicate, compared with the reference GTCC, the annual net power output is enhanced by 38.05 and 59.90 GWh in schemes 1 and 2. The economic analysis suggests scheme 2 outperforms scheme 1: for schemes 1 and 2, the dynamic payback periods are 10.61 and 5.62 years, with the corresponding net present value increments being 12.74 and 38.05 million USD, the levelized cost of electricity of the augmented power are 0.16 and 0.12 USD/kWh, and the levelized cost of hydrogen is 3.98 USD/(kg H 2 ). • Two schemes are proposed for GTCC power augmentation by compressor inlet air cooling. • The net present value increments of the two schemes are 12.74 and 38.05 million USD. • The dynamic payback periods of the two schemes are 10.61 and 5.62 years. • The levelized cost of electricity of the two schemes are 0.16 and 0.12 USD/kWh. • The levelized cost of hydrogen of the two schemes is 3.98 USD/(kg H 2 ).

EnergyVol. 328
North China Electric Power University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
2.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.