An analysis of model testing and finite element approach for distribution of earth pressures

This study presents a comprehensive comparison of laboratory experiments and numerical simulations using finite element analysis (FEA) to investigate the effects of various geotextile spacing on the distribution of earth pressure. The experiments were conducted in the "Tiger Cage (TC)" testing facility at the University of Colorado Denver's (UCD) Geotechnical Engineering Science Center. A total of four large-scale tests were performed on Leyden Clay (LC) and Colorado Department of Transportation Class 1 Structure Backfill Material (CDOT Class 1 SBM) to validate the finite element model. The research focuses on the distribution of earth pressure on Leyden Clay and CDOT Class 1 SBM, validated through large-scale physical tests and 3D FEA simulations performed using the LS-DYNA and ABAQUS software. The results demonstrate the accuracy of numerical models in predicting earth pressure distributions, with strong correlations observed between experimental data and simulation results. The study reveals that the current method provision is inaccurate in predicting earth pressure distribution at the bottom of the wall, as the predicted data from numerical models show the highest earth pressures of 485Kpa around two-thirds of the wall height (150 cm). This research provides valuable insights into soil-structure interaction, contributing to the design and analysis of retaining walls and foundations in geotechnical engineering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alexandria Engineering Journal
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2025.04.083
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An analysis of model testing and finite element approach for distribution of earth pressures

Jungang Liu, Geng Chen, Liang Feng
Alexandria Engineering Journal
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

An analysis of model testing and finite element approach for distribution of earth pressures

Jungang Liu, Geng Chen, Liang Feng
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive comparison of laboratory experiments and numerical simulations using finite element analysis (FEA) to investigate the effects of various geotextile spacing on the distribution of earth pressure. The experiments were conducted in the "Tiger Cage (TC)" testing facility at the University of Colorado Denver's (UCD) Geotechnical Engineering Science Center. A total of four large-scale tests were performed on Leyden Clay (LC) and Colorado Department of Transportation Class 1 Structure Backfill Material (CDOT Class 1 SBM) to validate the finite element model. The research focuses on the distribution of earth pressure on Leyden Clay and CDOT Class 1 SBM, validated through large-scale physical tests and 3D FEA simulations performed using the LS-DYNA and ABAQUS software. The results demonstrate the accuracy of numerical models in predicting earth pressure distributions, with strong correlations observed between experimental data and simulation results. The study reveals that the current method provision is inaccurate in predicting earth pressure distribution at the bottom of the wall, as the predicted data from numerical models show the highest earth pressures of 485Kpa around two-thirds of the wall height (150 cm). This research provides valuable insights into soil-structure interaction, contributing to the design and analysis of retaining walls and foundations in geotechnical engineering.

Alexandria Engineering JournalVol. 127
Hubei Polytechnic University (CN), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.