Can LLM-generated misinformation be detected: A study on Cyber Threat Intelligence

Given the increasing number and severity of cyber attacks, there has been a surge in cybersecurity information across various mediums such as posts, news articles, reports, and other resources. Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) involves processing data from these cybersecurity sources, enabling professionals and organizations to gain valuable insights. However, with the rapid dissemination of cybersecurity information, the inclusion of fake CTI can lead to severe consequences, including data poisoning attacks. To address this challenge, we have implemented a three-step strategy: generating synthetic CTI, evaluating the quality of the generated CTI, and detecting fake CTI. Unlike other subdomains, such as fake COVID news detection, there is currently no publicly available dataset specifically tailored for fake CTI detection research. To address this gap, we first establish a reliable groundtruth dataset by utilizing domain-specific cybersecurity data to fine-tune a Large Language Model (LLM) for synthetic CTI generation. We then employ crowdsourcing techniques and advanced synthetic data verification methods to evaluate the quality of the generated dataset, introducing a novel evaluation methodology that combines quantitative and qualitative approaches. Our comprehensive evaluation reveals that the generated CTI cannot be distinguished from genuine CTI by human annotators, regardless of their computer science background, demonstrating the effectiveness of our generation approach. We benchmark various misinformation detection techniques against our groundtruth dataset to establish baseline performance metrics for identifying fake CTI. By leveraging existing techniques and adapting them to the context of fake CTI detection, we provide a foundation for future research in this critical field. To facilitate further research, we make our code, dataset, and experimental results publicly available on GitHub . • Establishment of the first extensive dataset for fake CTI detection by fine- tuning an LLM on CTI resources verified and annotated by humans, offering a publicly accessible groundtruth dataset. • Design of a hybrid validation framework that leverages expert crowdsourcing and quantitative metrics to assess the ability of LLM-generated CTI to mimic human-generated content. • Applying advanced misinformation detection techniques to the benchmark dataset yields initial performance metrics for detecting LLM-generated fake CTI. • Analysis of critical factors influencing the detection of LLM-generated threat intelligence, providing evidence-based insights to guide future research in securing CTI against misinformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Generation Computer Systems
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2025.107877
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can LLM-generated misinformation be detected: A study on Cyber Threat Intelligence

Leo Yu Zhang, Sanjay Jha, Jiaojiao Jiang, He Huang et al.
6 citations
Future Generation Computer Systems
Misinformation and Its Impacts
25.21
article

Can LLM-generated misinformation be detected: A study on Cyber Threat Intelligence

Leo Yu Zhang, Sanjay Jha, Jiaojiao Jiang, He Huang, Nan Sun, Massimiliano Tani
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Given the increasing number and severity of cyber attacks, there has been a surge in cybersecurity information across various mediums such as posts, news articles, reports, and other resources. Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) involves processing data from these cybersecurity sources, enabling professionals and organizations to gain valuable insights. However, with the rapid dissemination of cybersecurity information, the inclusion of fake CTI can lead to severe consequences, including data poisoning attacks. To address this challenge, we have implemented a three-step strategy: generating synthetic CTI, evaluating the quality of the generated CTI, and detecting fake CTI. Unlike other subdomains, such as fake COVID news detection, there is currently no publicly available dataset specifically tailored for fake CTI detection research. To address this gap, we first establish a reliable groundtruth dataset by utilizing domain-specific cybersecurity data to fine-tune a Large Language Model (LLM) for synthetic CTI generation. We then employ crowdsourcing techniques and advanced synthetic data verification methods to evaluate the quality of the generated dataset, introducing a novel evaluation methodology that combines quantitative and qualitative approaches. Our comprehensive evaluation reveals that the generated CTI cannot be distinguished from genuine CTI by human annotators, regardless of their computer science background, demonstrating the effectiveness of our generation approach. We benchmark various misinformation detection techniques against our groundtruth dataset to establish baseline performance metrics for identifying fake CTI. By leveraging existing techniques and adapting them to the context of fake CTI detection, we provide a foundation for future research in this critical field. To facilitate further research, we make our code, dataset, and experimental results publicly available on GitHub . • Establishment of the first extensive dataset for fake CTI detection by fine- tuning an LLM on CTI resources verified and annotated by humans, offering a publicly accessible groundtruth dataset. • Design of a hybrid validation framework that leverages expert crowdsourcing and quantitative metrics to assess the ability of LLM-generated CTI to mimic human-generated content. • Applying advanced misinformation detection techniques to the benchmark dataset yields initial performance metrics for detecting LLM-generated fake CTI. • Analysis of critical factors influencing the detection of LLM-generated threat intelligence, providing evidence-based insights to guide future research in securing CTI against misinformation.

Future Generation Computer SystemsVol. 173
University of Canberra (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Australian Defence Force Academy (AU)
University of New South Wales
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
25.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.