Comparative Perioperative Inflammatory and Functional Outcomes in Single Versus Multiple Joint Replacements for Hemophilic Arthritis: A Pilot Study
This study demonstrates that MJR offers superior functional recovery compared to SJR, without increasing the risks of infection, bleeding, or transfusion. These findings support MJR as a safe and effective surgical option for hemophilic arthritis patients when appropriate perioperative management protocols are implemented. Future studies with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up are needed to validate these results and explore extended outcomes.
Authors
- Gaorui Cai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2953-9523)
- Zhenzhong Zhou
- Maoye Shen
- Shanyou Yuan
- Wenxue Jiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1712-5144)
- Xianjia Ning (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-3515)
- Jinghua Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2619-0570)
- Lixia Song (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2101-253X)
- Xiaona Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2556-3108)
- Ping Qian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5728-521X)
Institutions
- Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Orthopaedic Surgery
- Published
- 2025-05-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70045
- Primary Topic
- Hemophilia Treatment and Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00