Effects of biochar combined with different nitrogen fertilization rates on turf quality and carbon footprint in a turf system

Biochar has been widely recognized for its potential to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and enhance soil fertility through increased soil organic carbon (SOC) storage; however, systematic evaluations of carbon balance and ecological benefits in turf systems remain scarce. This study included eight treatments combining four N (nitrogen) rates (N 0 : 0, N 1 : 150, N 2 : 225, N 3 : 300) kg N ha -1 with two biochar practices (SB 0 : 0, SB:40) t ha -1 . The results showed that biochar application treatments (N 0 SB, N 1 SB, N 2 SB, and N 3 SB) reduced cumulative fluxes of soil N 2 O and CH 4 (global warming potential, GWP) by 17.37%, 26.62%, 32.73%, and 30.97%, net global warming potential (NGWP) 43.71%, 369.64%, 1046.17%, and 545.83%, and CF by 32.01%, 192.81%, 356.66%, and 253.34%, while increasing SOC sequestration by 129.20%, 138.61%, 133.89%, and 133.61%, total biomass by 3.99%, 14.22%, 15.51%, and 14.78%, and turf normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) by -0.18%, 2.81%, 2.81%, and 1.89% compared to non-biochar treatments. Although biochar slightly increased ecosystem respiration, the effect was not significant ( p > 0.05). Notably, compared to N 3 SB, N 2 SB significantly reduced N 2 O by 12.85%, CH 4 by 11.47%, CF (carbon footprint) by 16.01%, and NGWP by 9.82%, while ecosystem respiration, SOC storage, turfgrass total biomass, and NDVI exhibited no significant differences between the two treatments. Overall, the co-application of biochar with 225 kg N ha -1 is a win−win strategy for reducing CF, enhancing carbon sequestration, and maintaining turf quality. • GHG emissions, SOC sequestration and turf quality of different turf managements were evaluated. • Biochar reduced carbon footprint by enhancing SOC sequestration and mitigating GWP. • Combining biochar with moderate nitrogen input (N 2 ) optimized carbon sequestration while maintaining turf growth and quality. • Excessive nitrogen (N 3 ) yielded no additional benefits over moderate levels, emphasizing the importance of balanced N management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2025.104249
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of biochar combined with different nitrogen fertilization rates on turf quality and carbon footprint in a turf system

Songsong Shen, Jingjin Yu, Shang Pan, Zhimin Yang
1 citations
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
0.86
article

Effects of biochar combined with different nitrogen fertilization rates on turf quality and carbon footprint in a turf system

Songsong Shen, Jingjin Yu, Shang Pan, Zhimin Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Biochar has been widely recognized for its potential to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and enhance soil fertility through increased soil organic carbon (SOC) storage; however, systematic evaluations of carbon balance and ecological benefits in turf systems remain scarce. This study included eight treatments combining four N (nitrogen) rates (N 0 : 0, N 1 : 150, N 2 : 225, N 3 : 300) kg N ha -1 with two biochar practices (SB 0 : 0, SB:40) t ha -1 . The results showed that biochar application treatments (N 0 SB, N 1 SB, N 2 SB, and N 3 SB) reduced cumulative fluxes of soil N 2 O and CH 4 (global warming potential, GWP) by 17.37%, 26.62%, 32.73%, and 30.97%, net global warming potential (NGWP) 43.71%, 369.64%, 1046.17%, and 545.83%, and CF by 32.01%, 192.81%, 356.66%, and 253.34%, while increasing SOC sequestration by 129.20%, 138.61%, 133.89%, and 133.61%, total biomass by 3.99%, 14.22%, 15.51%, and 14.78%, and turf normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) by -0.18%, 2.81%, 2.81%, and 1.89% compared to non-biochar treatments. Although biochar slightly increased ecosystem respiration, the effect was not significant ( p > 0.05). Notably, compared to N 3 SB, N 2 SB significantly reduced N 2 O by 12.85%, CH 4 by 11.47%, CF (carbon footprint) by 16.01%, and NGWP by 9.82%, while ecosystem respiration, SOC storage, turfgrass total biomass, and NDVI exhibited no significant differences between the two treatments. Overall, the co-application of biochar with 225 kg N ha -1 is a win−win strategy for reducing CF, enhancing carbon sequestration, and maintaining turf quality. • GHG emissions, SOC sequestration and turf quality of different turf managements were evaluated. • Biochar reduced carbon footprint by enhancing SOC sequestration and mitigating GWP. • Combining biochar with moderate nitrogen input (N 2 ) optimized carbon sequestration while maintaining turf growth and quality. • Excessive nitrogen (N 3 ) yielded no additional benefits over moderate levels, emphasizing the importance of balanced N management.

Environmental Technology & InnovationVol. 39
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.