River total dissolved gas prediction using a hybrid greedy-stepwise feature selection and bidirectional long short-term memory model

The supersaturation of total dissolved gas (TDG) in rivers serves as a critical indicator of water quality downstream of high dams. This study models TDG levels at two monitoring stations in the Columbia and Snake River Basins (USA), where high TDG concentrations were recorded. Hourly data on water temperature, barometric pressure, dam spill, sensor depth, and discharge serve as input variables for deep-learning models. Several models are developed and tested, including long short-term memory (LSTM), bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU), and an alternating model tree (AMT) hybridized with iterative absolute error regression (IAER) and iterative classifier optimizer (ICO) algorithms. A greedy stepwise feature selection technique (GSFST) is employed to identify the optimal model inputs. Each model is trained and evaluated at one station and validated at the second station to assess transferability and generalization capability. Model performance was compared using multiple quantitative and qualitative metrics, including the Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency and uncertainty coefficient. Additionally, Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests confirmed statistically significant differences between models. Dam spills emerged as the most influential predictor of TDG levels at both sites. The GSFST selected the optimal input combination, including dam spill, water temperature, barometric pressure, and sensor depth. Among all models, GSFST-BiLSTM achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with Nash–Sutcliffe values of 0.95 (testing) and 0.90 (validation) and uncertainty coefficients of 5.2 % and 7.0 %, respectively. These findings demonstrate that GSFST-BiLSTM provides a robust and transferable framework for TDG prediction, with the potential for broader application pending further validation. • LSTM, BiLSTM, and GRU are compared against hybrid IAER-AMT and ICO-AMT models. • The Greedy Stepwise Feature Selection Technique (GSFST) is employed to identify the most effective input scenario. • Model evaluation is conducted using Friedman and Wilcoxon tests, along with other error metrics. • The GSFST-BiLSTM model achieved the highest predictive accuracy in both testing and validation phases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Informatics
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103191
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

River total dissolved gas prediction using a hybrid greedy-stepwise feature selection and bidirectional long short-term memory model

Salim Heddam, Sayed M. Bateni, Dongkyun Kim, Changhyun Jun et al.
2 citations
Ecological Informatics
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
1.60
article

River total dissolved gas prediction using a hybrid greedy-stepwise feature selection and bidirectional long short-term memory model

Salim Heddam, Sayed M. Bateni, Dongkyun Kim, Changhyun Jun, Essam Heggy, Khabat Khosravi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The supersaturation of total dissolved gas (TDG) in rivers serves as a critical indicator of water quality downstream of high dams. This study models TDG levels at two monitoring stations in the Columbia and Snake River Basins (USA), where high TDG concentrations were recorded. Hourly data on water temperature, barometric pressure, dam spill, sensor depth, and discharge serve as input variables for deep-learning models. Several models are developed and tested, including long short-term memory (LSTM), bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU), and an alternating model tree (AMT) hybridized with iterative absolute error regression (IAER) and iterative classifier optimizer (ICO) algorithms. A greedy stepwise feature selection technique (GSFST) is employed to identify the optimal model inputs. Each model is trained and evaluated at one station and validated at the second station to assess transferability and generalization capability. Model performance was compared using multiple quantitative and qualitative metrics, including the Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency and uncertainty coefficient. Additionally, Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests confirmed statistically significant differences between models. Dam spills emerged as the most influential predictor of TDG levels at both sites. The GSFST selected the optimal input combination, including dam spill, water temperature, barometric pressure, and sensor depth. Among all models, GSFST-BiLSTM achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with Nash–Sutcliffe values of 0.95 (testing) and 0.90 (validation) and uncertainty coefficients of 5.2 % and 7.0 %, respectively. These findings demonstrate that GSFST-BiLSTM provides a robust and transferable framework for TDG prediction, with the potential for broader application pending further validation. • LSTM, BiLSTM, and GRU are compared against hybrid IAER-AMT and ICO-AMT models. • The Greedy Stepwise Feature Selection Technique (GSFST) is employed to identify the most effective input scenario. • Model evaluation is conducted using Friedman and Wilcoxon tests, along with other error metrics. • The GSFST-BiLSTM model achieved the highest predictive accuracy in both testing and validation phases.

Ecological InformaticsVol. 90
University of Southern California (US), University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), Razi University (IR), University of South Africa (ZA), Korea University (KR), Hongik University (KR), University of Skikda (DZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.