Motivations and motivational typologies of Tennessee small game hunters

Context Participation declines in small game hunting are worrying because of the subsequent decline in conservation funding generated from hunting and social tradition. To address declines, it is critical to understand the motivations of small game hunters. Literature on hunter motivations has primarily focused on big game and waterfowl hunters, which may not apply to small game hunters. Aims The aim of this article was to understand what motivates small game hunters to participate and to identify existing motivational-based typologies. Methods Following the end of the 2019–2020 small game hunting season, a sample of 15,115 Tennessee hunters and trappers were asked to participate in a mix-mode questionnaire. Key results A total of 3994 individuals responded to the questionnaire and 1440 reported that they participated in the 2019–2020 hunting and trapping season, of which 634 hunted small game. A multivariate cluster analysis identified the following four motivational clusters: overall enthusiasts (39%), social-nature hunters (22%), less-engaged hunters (11%), and social-experiential hunters (28%). Conclusion Our findings showed that Tennessee small game hunters possess a variety of motivations beyond harvesting an animal. The importance of various motivations differed among clusters. Implications Rather than managing for the ‘average small game hunter,’ agencies should aim to provide experiences that satisfy a variety of motivations. Because appreciative and affiliative motivations were important to most clusters, agencies may want to focus on addressing these motivations because these are more likely to meet the desires of multiple groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Research
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/wr24143
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motivations and motivational typologies of Tennessee small game hunters

Neelam C. Poudyal, Kiley M. D. Fryman
1 citations
Wildlife Research
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
2.44
article

Motivations and motivational typologies of Tennessee small game hunters

Neelam C. Poudyal, Kiley M. D. Fryman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Context Participation declines in small game hunting are worrying because of the subsequent decline in conservation funding generated from hunting and social tradition. To address declines, it is critical to understand the motivations of small game hunters. Literature on hunter motivations has primarily focused on big game and waterfowl hunters, which may not apply to small game hunters. Aims The aim of this article was to understand what motivates small game hunters to participate and to identify existing motivational-based typologies. Methods Following the end of the 2019–2020 small game hunting season, a sample of 15,115 Tennessee hunters and trappers were asked to participate in a mix-mode questionnaire. Key results A total of 3994 individuals responded to the questionnaire and 1440 reported that they participated in the 2019–2020 hunting and trapping season, of which 634 hunted small game. A multivariate cluster analysis identified the following four motivational clusters: overall enthusiasts (39%), social-nature hunters (22%), less-engaged hunters (11%), and social-experiential hunters (28%). Conclusion Our findings showed that Tennessee small game hunters possess a variety of motivations beyond harvesting an animal. The importance of various motivations differed among clusters. Implications Rather than managing for the ‘average small game hunter,’ agencies should aim to provide experiences that satisfy a variety of motivations. Because appreciative and affiliative motivations were important to most clusters, agencies may want to focus on addressing these motivations because these are more likely to meet the desires of multiple groups.

Wildlife ResearchVol. 52(5)
University of Minnesota (US), Department of Forestry (MW), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.