Changes in pasture and soil properties with liming and superphosphate application on five soils in the Central Tablelands of New South Wales over 12 years

Context The decision to lime pastures requires understanding of the benefits and their duration. Aims To quantify the effects of contrasting rates of superphosphate and lime on soil chemistry and pasture productivity on five acidic soils over 12 years. Methods The sites were established in 1978 on the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, Australia. Initial treatments of lime were 0, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5 and 5.0 t/ha. Single superphosphate (SSP) was top-dressed annually at 0, 125 and 250 kg/ha. Key results Across the five sites, initial pH increase due to liming was 0.3 units/t. After 12 years, pH declined to 0.1 pH units/t. Without lime, soil pH declined by ~0.02 units/year. For all lime treatments and sites, the annual decline averaged ~0.07 units/year. Annual applications of SSP were associated with lower soil pH and exchangeable soil K and higher Al saturation, but differences required 2–7 years to emerge. There was an increase in annual dry matter with SSP application. Lime generally increased pasture biomass, with pastures dominated by Trifolium subterraneum. Pasture yields generally increased with exchangeable Ca but yield responses to %Al were more variable. Conclusions A single application of lime had many enduring beneficial effects on soil chemistry, still evident 12 years following application and generally proportional to the quantum of lime initially applied. Ongoing applications of SSP led to cumulative changes in some soil properties and resulted in an increase in pasture productivity. Implications The historical view of lime and SSP being alternative investments is counterproductive. Pasture renovation may be necessary to realise the full benefit of lime and SSP application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop and Pasture Science
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/cp24336
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pasture and Agricultural Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in pasture and soil properties with liming and superphosphate application on five soils in the Central Tablelands of New South Wales over 12 years

Richard C. Hayes, G. D. Millar, M. K. Conyers, I. A. Vimpany et al.
2 citations
Crop and Pasture Science
Pasture and Agricultural Systems
12.86
article

Changes in pasture and soil properties with liming and superphosphate application on five soils in the Central Tablelands of New South Wales over 12 years

Richard C. Hayes, G. D. Millar, M. K. Conyers, I. A. Vimpany, Paul J. Milham, DL Michalk, P. M. Dowling, H. I. Nicol, J. S. Bradley, K. R. Helyar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Context The decision to lime pastures requires understanding of the benefits and their duration. Aims To quantify the effects of contrasting rates of superphosphate and lime on soil chemistry and pasture productivity on five acidic soils over 12 years. Methods The sites were established in 1978 on the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, Australia. Initial treatments of lime were 0, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5 and 5.0 t/ha. Single superphosphate (SSP) was top-dressed annually at 0, 125 and 250 kg/ha. Key results Across the five sites, initial pH increase due to liming was 0.3 units/t. After 12 years, pH declined to 0.1 pH units/t. Without lime, soil pH declined by ~0.02 units/year. For all lime treatments and sites, the annual decline averaged ~0.07 units/year. Annual applications of SSP were associated with lower soil pH and exchangeable soil K and higher Al saturation, but differences required 2–7 years to emerge. There was an increase in annual dry matter with SSP application. Lime generally increased pasture biomass, with pastures dominated by Trifolium subterraneum. Pasture yields generally increased with exchangeable Ca but yield responses to %Al were more variable. Conclusions A single application of lime had many enduring beneficial effects on soil chemistry, still evident 12 years following application and generally proportional to the quantum of lime initially applied. Ongoing applications of SSP led to cumulative changes in some soil properties and resulted in an increase in pasture productivity. Implications The historical view of lime and SSP being alternative investments is counterproductive. Pasture renovation may be necessary to realise the full benefit of lime and SSP application.

Crop and Pasture ScienceVol. 76(5)
Charles Sturt University (AU), New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU), Wagga Wagga Base Hospital (AU), Frequentis (Germany) (DE), Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Pasture and Agricultural Systems
12.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.