Economic feasibility analysis of LHTES integration with a nuclear power plant

Integrating latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) systems into nuclear power plants (NPPs) is a promising approach to improve operational efficiency and ensure load leveling. This study presents a combined techno-economic analysis of LHTES unit integration with the APR1400 reactor. ε -NTU method is used to estimate the design parameters and the performance of the LHTES unit. Capital and operational expenses are estimated for the integrated power generation cycle, considering a life cycle of 25 years. Assuming a 4.83 % annual growth rate in tariffs, annual revenue generated under peak and off-peak tariff scenarios are estimated. Net present value (NPV) analysis is performed for varying phase change material (PCM) costs to determine the profitability thresholds. Based on the NPV results, payback periods are calculated, revealing that profitability can be achieved with peak tariff scenarios at all PCM costs. Internal rate of return (IRR) calculations further demonstrate the conditions under which the system can exceed profitability thresholds. A break-even analysis identifies critical tariff growth rates and PCM cost limits, indicating that the project becomes profitable when the tariff growth rate is above 3.12 % for peak tariffs and 8.18 % for off-peak tariffs. A Monte Carlo (MC) method-based probability analysis shows that the probability of profit is 99.75 % for the peak tariff scenario. Tariff growth and discount rates are the key parameters with high normalized sensitivity indices. Finally, 2D NPV maps demonstrate the combined impact of tariff growth rate and discount rate, providing actionable insights for decision-makers. The economic evaluation reveals that the LHTES system achieves a payback period of 2.71, 3.66, and 5.09 years for PCM costs of 0.6, 2.3, and 4.0 USD/kg, respectively, under peak tariff conditions. The corresponding NPVs by 2050 are 132.69, 68.67, and 4.28 million USD, with internal rates of return (IRR) of 13.28 %, 10.24 %, and 7.20 %. All three cases exhibit benefit-to-cost ratios exceeding unity, confirming profitability. Conversely, under off-peak tariff scenarios, none of the configurations achieve payback within the 25-year project life, and all result in negative NPVs and IRRs, with benefit-to-cost ratios ranging from 0.577 to 0.823. The comprehensive techno-economic analysis of LHTES integration with nuclear power generation highlights the key parameters that drive profitability. Deeper insights are obtained into the economic feasibility of integrating LHTES systems in nuclear power plants. • Economic feasibility of thermal storage with nuclear plant is investigated. • Profitability is achieved only under peak tariff conditions. • Payback period is 2.7–5.1 years under peak tariff conditions. • Tariff growth and discount rate are key drivers of project profitability. • Peak tariff scenarios show 99.75 % chance of positive project returns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Energy
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126026
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Power Generation Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic feasibility analysis of LHTES integration with a nuclear power plant

Yulong Ding, Siyuan Dai, Ameera F. Mohammad, Ahmed K. Alkaabi et al.
3 citations
Applied Energy
Advanced Power Generation Technologies
2.19
article

Economic feasibility analysis of LHTES integration with a nuclear power plant

Yulong Ding, Siyuan Dai, Ameera F. Mohammad, Ahmed K. Alkaabi, R. Deepak Selvakumar
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Integrating latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) systems into nuclear power plants (NPPs) is a promising approach to improve operational efficiency and ensure load leveling. This study presents a combined techno-economic analysis of LHTES unit integration with the APR1400 reactor. ε -NTU method is used to estimate the design parameters and the performance of the LHTES unit. Capital and operational expenses are estimated for the integrated power generation cycle, considering a life cycle of 25 years. Assuming a 4.83 % annual growth rate in tariffs, annual revenue generated under peak and off-peak tariff scenarios are estimated. Net present value (NPV) analysis is performed for varying phase change material (PCM) costs to determine the profitability thresholds. Based on the NPV results, payback periods are calculated, revealing that profitability can be achieved with peak tariff scenarios at all PCM costs. Internal rate of return (IRR) calculations further demonstrate the conditions under which the system can exceed profitability thresholds. A break-even analysis identifies critical tariff growth rates and PCM cost limits, indicating that the project becomes profitable when the tariff growth rate is above 3.12 % for peak tariffs and 8.18 % for off-peak tariffs. A Monte Carlo (MC) method-based probability analysis shows that the probability of profit is 99.75 % for the peak tariff scenario. Tariff growth and discount rates are the key parameters with high normalized sensitivity indices. Finally, 2D NPV maps demonstrate the combined impact of tariff growth rate and discount rate, providing actionable insights for decision-makers. The economic evaluation reveals that the LHTES system achieves a payback period of 2.71, 3.66, and 5.09 years for PCM costs of 0.6, 2.3, and 4.0 USD/kg, respectively, under peak tariff conditions. The corresponding NPVs by 2050 are 132.69, 68.67, and 4.28 million USD, with internal rates of return (IRR) of 13.28 %, 10.24 %, and 7.20 %. All three cases exhibit benefit-to-cost ratios exceeding unity, confirming profitability. Conversely, under off-peak tariff scenarios, none of the configurations achieve payback within the 25-year project life, and all result in negative NPVs and IRRs, with benefit-to-cost ratios ranging from 0.577 to 0.823. The comprehensive techno-economic analysis of LHTES integration with nuclear power generation highlights the key parameters that drive profitability. Deeper insights are obtained into the economic feasibility of integrating LHTES systems in nuclear power plants. • Economic feasibility of thermal storage with nuclear plant is investigated. • Profitability is achieved only under peak tariff conditions. • Payback period is 2.7–5.1 years under peak tariff conditions. • Tariff growth and discount rate are key drivers of project profitability. • Peak tariff scenarios show 99.75 % chance of positive project returns.

Applied EnergyVol. 392
Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE), University of Birmingham (GB)
Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research, Malawi University of Science and Technology
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Advanced Power Generation Technologies
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.