Review of geophysical data acquisition methods for underground feature detection and future trends

Accelerated human activities and the growing demand for natural resources have facilitated the need for a comprehensive understanding of subsurface environments. This paper comprehensively reviews non-destructive geophysical data acquisition methods for underground feature detection (UFD), focusing on wave-based methods (e.g., seismic and acoustic waves), electromagnetic field-based methods (e.g., electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and transient electromagnetic method (TEM)), and density contrast-based methods (gravimetry and muography). The principles, historical development, current research trends and field applications of each method are discussed, with their respective advantages and limitations analysed. Wave-based methods, such as ground-penetrating radar and seismic reflection, offer high-resolution imaging for near-surface cavities but are constrained by signal attenuation and geological heterogeneity. Electromagnetic methods provide deeper penetration but are affected by external interference and conductivity variations. Density contrast-based methods provide stable and non-invasive detection of deeply buried cavities, although conventional gravimeters face challenges related to resolution and sensitivity. Quantum gravimeter, the most recent advancement, leverages atomic interferometry for unparalleled precision, yet its widespread adoption remains constrained by issues of portability, environmental stability, and cost. Future advancements will focus on enhancing detection accuracy, improving real-world applicability, and integrating artificial intelligence to automate data processing and refine multi-method data fusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2025.106731
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Geophysical Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of geophysical data acquisition methods for underground feature detection and future trends

Chao Wang, Zili Li, Chaochao Peng
7 citations
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Geophysical Methods and Applications
8.02
article

Review of geophysical data acquisition methods for underground feature detection and future trends

Chao Wang, Zili Li, Chaochao Peng
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Accelerated human activities and the growing demand for natural resources have facilitated the need for a comprehensive understanding of subsurface environments. This paper comprehensively reviews non-destructive geophysical data acquisition methods for underground feature detection (UFD), focusing on wave-based methods (e.g., seismic and acoustic waves), electromagnetic field-based methods (e.g., electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and transient electromagnetic method (TEM)), and density contrast-based methods (gravimetry and muography). The principles, historical development, current research trends and field applications of each method are discussed, with their respective advantages and limitations analysed. Wave-based methods, such as ground-penetrating radar and seismic reflection, offer high-resolution imaging for near-surface cavities but are constrained by signal attenuation and geological heterogeneity. Electromagnetic methods provide deeper penetration but are affected by external interference and conductivity variations. Density contrast-based methods provide stable and non-invasive detection of deeply buried cavities, although conventional gravimeters face challenges related to resolution and sensitivity. Quantum gravimeter, the most recent advancement, leverages atomic interferometry for unparalleled precision, yet its widespread adoption remains constrained by issues of portability, environmental stability, and cost. Future advancements will focus on enhancing detection accuracy, improving real-world applicability, and integrating artificial intelligence to automate data processing and refine multi-method data fusion.

Tunnelling and Underground Space TechnologyVol. 163
University College Cork (IE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geophysical Methods and Applications
8.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.