Comprehensive machine learning approaches for modelling the state of charge of lithium-ion batteries

The advancement of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is vital for achieving net-zero emissions because it enables renewable energy integration, supports electric vehicle (EV) adoption, and promotes cost-effective and sustainable solutions. The growing demand for EVs and portable electronics has amplified the need for reliable battery management systems to ensure safety and performance. Machine learning (ML) methods for modelling the state of charge (SOC) in batteries are gaining traction owing to their adaptability to diverse datasets and lower computational demands. However, the challenge lies in selecting the most suitable ML architecture for a specific application. This study evaluates three ML approaches for SOC modelling in LIBs: multilayer perceptron (MLP), long short-term memory (LSTM), and nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous input (NARX) neural networks. The models were tested using an experimental dataset with multiple input variables, including electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data, voltage, and capacity from commercial LIB cells. The results show that MLP and LSTM perform effectively with smaller training datasets (14 samples), whereas the NARX model requires more extensive data (34 out of 67 samples) for accuracy. Additionally, the NARX model showed greater sensitivity to learning rate adjustments and hidden layer configurations, whereas MLP and LSTM maintained robust performance across varying parameters. • MLP, LSTM and NARX are used to model SOC in LiBs with coarse datasets. • MLP and LSTM are more adaptable with a smaller training dataset. • Higher correlation between SOC and EIS data is found for EIS measured at 0% SOC. • Strengths and weaknesses of the MLP, LSTM and NARX are discussed. • Effects of training size, hidden layers and learning rates of ANNs are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Power Sources
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.236929
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive machine learning approaches for modelling the state of charge of lithium-ion batteries

Mehakpreet Singh, Kevin M. Ryan, Dominika Capková, M. Ottaviani et al.
8 citations
Journal of Power Sources
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
5.46
article

Comprehensive machine learning approaches for modelling the state of charge of lithium-ion batteries

Mehakpreet Singh, Kevin M. Ryan, Dominika Capková, M. Ottaviani, Stefano Passerini, Tomáš Kazda, Mitchell Rae, Luigi Jacopo Santa Maria
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The advancement of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is vital for achieving net-zero emissions because it enables renewable energy integration, supports electric vehicle (EV) adoption, and promotes cost-effective and sustainable solutions. The growing demand for EVs and portable electronics has amplified the need for reliable battery management systems to ensure safety and performance. Machine learning (ML) methods for modelling the state of charge (SOC) in batteries are gaining traction owing to their adaptability to diverse datasets and lower computational demands. However, the challenge lies in selecting the most suitable ML architecture for a specific application. This study evaluates three ML approaches for SOC modelling in LIBs: multilayer perceptron (MLP), long short-term memory (LSTM), and nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous input (NARX) neural networks. The models were tested using an experimental dataset with multiple input variables, including electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data, voltage, and capacity from commercial LIB cells. The results show that MLP and LSTM perform effectively with smaller training datasets (14 samples), whereas the NARX model requires more extensive data (34 out of 67 samples) for accuracy. Additionally, the NARX model showed greater sensitivity to learning rate adjustments and hidden layer configurations, whereas MLP and LSTM maintained robust performance across varying parameters. • MLP, LSTM and NARX are used to model SOC in LiBs with coarse datasets. • MLP and LSTM are more adaptable with a smaller training dataset. • Higher correlation between SOC and EIS data is found for EIS measured at 0% SOC. • Strengths and weaknesses of the MLP, LSTM and NARX are discussed. • Effects of training size, hidden layers and learning rates of ANNs are discussed.

Journal of Power SourcesVol. 646
University of Limerick (IE), Shannon Applied Biotechnology Centre (IE), Helmholtz-Institute Ulm (DE), Brno University of Technology (CZ)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
5.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.