SegQC: a segmentation network-based framework for multi-metric segmentation quality control and segmentation error detection in volumetric medical images

Quality control (QC) of structures segmentation in volumetric medical images is important for identifying segmentation errors in clinical practice and for facilitating model development by enhancing network performance in semi-supervised and active learning scenarios. This paper introduces SegQC, a novel framework for segmentation quality estimation and segmentation error detection. SegQC computes an estimate measure of the quality of a segmentation in volumetric scans and in their individual slices and identifies possible segmentation error regions within a slice. The key components of SegQC include: 1) SegQCNet, a deep network that inputs a scan and its segmentation mask and outputs segmentation error probabilities for each voxel in the scan; 2) three new segmentation quality metrics computed from the segmentation error probabilities; 3) a new method for detecting possible segmentation errors in scan slices computed from the segmentation error probabilities. We introduce a novel evaluation scheme to measure segmentation error discrepancies based on an expert radiologist's corrections of automatically produced segmentations that yields smaller observer variability and is closer to actual segmentation errors. We demonstrate SegQC on three fetal structures in 198 fetal MRI scans - fetal brain, fetal body and the placenta. To assess the benefits of SegQC, we compare it to the unsupervised Test Time Augmentation (TTA)-based QC and to supervised autoencoder (AE)-based QC. Our studies indicate that SegQC outperforms TTA-based quality estimation for whole scans and individual slices in terms of Pearson correlation and MAE for fetal body and fetal brain structures segmentation as well as for volumetric overlap metrics estimation of the placenta structure. Compared to both unsupervised TTA and supervised AE methods, SegQC achieves lower MAE for both 3D and 2D Dice estimates and higher Pearson correlation for volumetric Dice. Our segmentation error detection method achieved recall and precision rates of 0.77 and 0.48 for fetal body, and 0.74 and 0.55 for fetal brain segmentation error detection, respectively. Ranking derived from metrics estimation surpasses rankings based on entropy and sum for TTA and SegQCNet estimations, respectively. SegQC provides high-quality metrics estimation for both 2D and 3D medical images as well as error localization within slices, offering important improvements to segmentation QC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Image Analysis
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2025.103638
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SegQC: a segmentation network-based framework for multi-metric segmentation quality control and segmentation error detection in volumetric medical images

Bella Specktor‐Fadida, Leo Joskowicz, Dafna Ben Bashat, Liat Ben‐Sira
3 citations
Medical Image Analysis
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
3.83
article

SegQC: a segmentation network-based framework for multi-metric segmentation quality control and segmentation error detection in volumetric medical images

Bella Specktor‐Fadida, Leo Joskowicz, Dafna Ben Bashat, Liat Ben‐Sira
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Quality control (QC) of structures segmentation in volumetric medical images is important for identifying segmentation errors in clinical practice and for facilitating model development by enhancing network performance in semi-supervised and active learning scenarios. This paper introduces SegQC, a novel framework for segmentation quality estimation and segmentation error detection. SegQC computes an estimate measure of the quality of a segmentation in volumetric scans and in their individual slices and identifies possible segmentation error regions within a slice. The key components of SegQC include: 1) SegQCNet, a deep network that inputs a scan and its segmentation mask and outputs segmentation error probabilities for each voxel in the scan; 2) three new segmentation quality metrics computed from the segmentation error probabilities; 3) a new method for detecting possible segmentation errors in scan slices computed from the segmentation error probabilities. We introduce a novel evaluation scheme to measure segmentation error discrepancies based on an expert radiologist's corrections of automatically produced segmentations that yields smaller observer variability and is closer to actual segmentation errors. We demonstrate SegQC on three fetal structures in 198 fetal MRI scans - fetal brain, fetal body and the placenta. To assess the benefits of SegQC, we compare it to the unsupervised Test Time Augmentation (TTA)-based QC and to supervised autoencoder (AE)-based QC. Our studies indicate that SegQC outperforms TTA-based quality estimation for whole scans and individual slices in terms of Pearson correlation and MAE for fetal body and fetal brain structures segmentation as well as for volumetric overlap metrics estimation of the placenta structure. Compared to both unsupervised TTA and supervised AE methods, SegQC achieves lower MAE for both 3D and 2D Dice estimates and higher Pearson correlation for volumetric Dice. Our segmentation error detection method achieved recall and precision rates of 0.77 and 0.48 for fetal body, and 0.74 and 0.55 for fetal brain segmentation error detection, respectively. Ranking derived from metrics estimation surpasses rankings based on entropy and sum for TTA and SegQCNet estimations, respectively. SegQC provides high-quality metrics estimation for both 2D and 3D medical images as well as error localization within slices, offering important improvements to segmentation QC.

Medical Image AnalysisVol. 103
Tel Aviv University (IL), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL), Haifa Medical Center (IL), University of Haifa (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
3.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.