Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications

Minimally invasive spinal surgery has made tremendous progress. The retroperitoneal lateral lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion techniques are increasingly used to treat a variety of lumbar spinal conditions. As with other minimally invasive techniques, the theoretical advantages include reduced blood loss, improved postoperative pain due to less retraction and smaller incisions, faster recovery, and eliminating the need for an approach surgeon. It allows the placement of a large cage that spans the apophyses and enables the achievement of indirect decompression as well as coronal and sagittal deformity correction. As experience grows and the techniques evolve further, indications might be expanded beyond their current limitations. However, as these techniques continue to grow in popularity, evidence-based risk-stratification systems are required. This study reviews the literature about the development and application of lateral lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion, with a discussion of its outcomes, approach-related complications specific to the lateral technique, and areas of new research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14444/8759
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications

Jaewan Soh, Jae‐Young Hong
3 citations
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
4.41
article

Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications

Jaewan Soh, Jae‐Young Hong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Minimally invasive spinal surgery has made tremendous progress. The retroperitoneal lateral lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion techniques are increasingly used to treat a variety of lumbar spinal conditions. As with other minimally invasive techniques, the theoretical advantages include reduced blood loss, improved postoperative pain due to less retraction and smaller incisions, faster recovery, and eliminating the need for an approach surgeon. It allows the placement of a large cage that spans the apophyses and enables the achievement of indirect decompression as well as coronal and sagittal deformity correction. As experience grows and the techniques evolve further, indications might be expanded beyond their current limitations. However, as these techniques continue to grow in popularity, evidence-based risk-stratification systems are required. This study reviews the literature about the development and application of lateral lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion, with a discussion of its outcomes, approach-related complications specific to the lateral technique, and areas of new research.

The International Journal of Spine SurgeryVol. 19(2)
Ansan University (KR), Hanyang University Guri Hospital (KR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
4.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Review of Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Outcomes, and Complications — Jaewan Soh, Jae‐Young Hong · The International Journal of Spine Surgery (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS