Why Christians Should Not Embrace Extreme Transhumanism

Abstract Extreme transhumanism involves prolonging our existence by sustaining our mental life without all of our body’s organic parts. Christians should be wary of these aims for metaphysical, moral, and theological reasons. The metaphysical qualms are based on our being human animals rather than distinct persons. So, extreme transhumanism will eliminate rather than enhance us because animals cannot become inorganic. Even if we are persons distinct from our animals, the moral worry is that extreme enhancements of persons will kill their human animals. Appeals to double effect in making such killings unintentional will fail as one cannot intend to so reconstruct a person without intending lethally to deconstruct the animal constituting the person. The theological concerns arise because inorganic enhancements of the person could produce the death of an animal composed of organic parts. The death of the animal would mean the overlapping person would also cease to instantiate life processes. This would initiate the onset of a divinely ordained intermediate state between death and resurrection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbaf005
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Christians Should Not Embrace Extreme Transhumanism

David B. Hershenov
1 citations
Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
1.43
article

Why Christians Should Not Embrace Extreme Transhumanism

David B. Hershenov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Extreme transhumanism involves prolonging our existence by sustaining our mental life without all of our body’s organic parts. Christians should be wary of these aims for metaphysical, moral, and theological reasons. The metaphysical qualms are based on our being human animals rather than distinct persons. So, extreme transhumanism will eliminate rather than enhance us because animals cannot become inorganic. Even if we are persons distinct from our animals, the moral worry is that extreme enhancements of persons will kill their human animals. Appeals to double effect in making such killings unintentional will fail as one cannot intend to so reconstruct a person without intending lethally to deconstruct the animal constituting the person. The theological concerns arise because inorganic enhancements of the person could produce the death of an animal composed of organic parts. The death of the animal would mean the overlapping person would also cease to instantiate life processes. This would initiate the onset of a divinely ordained intermediate state between death and resurrection.

Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical MoralityVol. 31(2)
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.