The monetary aspects of the Dutch disease

This article examines two facts of resource-rich developing economies during resource booms: (i) appreciation and depreciation of the real exchange rate (RER), and (ii) central bank monetisation of fiscal deficits. Our monetary model demonstrates that changes in bank loans, domestic public debt, and monetisation account for RER dynamics, not resource rents. Resource rents finance two deficits: (i) the fiscal deficit, raising domestic prices, and (ii) the non-resource current account deficit, increasing supply through imports and lowering domestic prices, which offset each other with a net-zero effect on the RER. In contrast, Dutch disease models assume resource rents are spent on non-tradables instead of imports. The case of Trinidad and Tobago (1979-2022) supports the model’s prediction: monetisation, not oil rents, drives the RER. Empirical studies must control for the non-resource current account deficit and money-financed fiscal expenditures. Finally, the non-resource primary fiscal deficit must not exceed foreign borrowing and resource-based funding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Economics & Finance
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104051
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Resources and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The monetary aspects of the Dutch disease

Collin Constantine, Tarron Khemraj
1 citations
International Review of Economics & Finance
Natural Resources and Economic Development
3.09
article

The monetary aspects of the Dutch disease

Collin Constantine, Tarron Khemraj
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article examines two facts of resource-rich developing economies during resource booms: (i) appreciation and depreciation of the real exchange rate (RER), and (ii) central bank monetisation of fiscal deficits. Our monetary model demonstrates that changes in bank loans, domestic public debt, and monetisation account for RER dynamics, not resource rents. Resource rents finance two deficits: (i) the fiscal deficit, raising domestic prices, and (ii) the non-resource current account deficit, increasing supply through imports and lowering domestic prices, which offset each other with a net-zero effect on the RER. In contrast, Dutch disease models assume resource rents are spent on non-tradables instead of imports. The case of Trinidad and Tobago (1979-2022) supports the model’s prediction: monetisation, not oil rents, drives the RER. Empirical studies must control for the non-resource current account deficit and money-financed fiscal expenditures. Finally, the non-resource primary fiscal deficit must not exceed foreign borrowing and resource-based funding.

International Review of Economics & FinanceVol. 101
University of Cambridge (GB), New College of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Natural Resources and Economic Development
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The monetary aspects of the Dutch disease — Collin Constantine, Tarron Khemraj · International Review of Economics & Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS