The impact of automated writing evaluation on writing gains

Abstract This study examines the effectiveness of ChatGPT in improving English writing skills for English as a foreign language (EFL) students over a nine-week intervention. Specifically, it explores ChatGPT’s impact on syntactic and lexical complexity—key dimensions of writing development. The study compares two groups: one receiving teacher feedback alone and another using ChatGPT alongside teacher feedback. Participants included 105 first-year university students in Belgium, divided into these two groups. Results indicate that while ChatGPT significantly affects text length and complexity, it does not necessarily lead to sustained writing improvement. This finding is crucial for researchers and educators integrating artificial intelligence (AI) tools with traditional teaching, as it refines current insights into generative AI’s educational potential. The study underscores the need for balanced approaches in writing instruction, where AI complements rather than replaces human feedback, ensuring that short-term benefits translate into long-term writing proficiency for EFL learners.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ELT Journal
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaf020
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of automated writing evaluation on writing gains

Liisa Buelens, David C. Chan, Laura Schildt, Marieke Vanbuel et al.
1 citations
ELT Journal
Writing and Handwriting Education
8.93
article

The impact of automated writing evaluation on writing gains

Liisa Buelens, David C. Chan, Laura Schildt, Marieke Vanbuel, Bart Deygers, Amaury Van Parys
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the effectiveness of ChatGPT in improving English writing skills for English as a foreign language (EFL) students over a nine-week intervention. Specifically, it explores ChatGPT’s impact on syntactic and lexical complexity—key dimensions of writing development. The study compares two groups: one receiving teacher feedback alone and another using ChatGPT alongside teacher feedback. Participants included 105 first-year university students in Belgium, divided into these two groups. Results indicate that while ChatGPT significantly affects text length and complexity, it does not necessarily lead to sustained writing improvement. This finding is crucial for researchers and educators integrating artificial intelligence (AI) tools with traditional teaching, as it refines current insights into generative AI’s educational potential. The study underscores the need for balanced approaches in writing instruction, where AI complements rather than replaces human feedback, ensuring that short-term benefits translate into long-term writing proficiency for EFL learners.

ELT JournalVol. 79(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Writing and Handwriting Education
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of automated writing evaluation on writing gains — Liisa Buelens, David C. Chan, et al. · ELT Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS