Machine learning identifies key individual and nation-level factors predicting climate-relevant beliefs and behaviors

While numerous studies have examined factors associated with climate-friendly beliefs and behaviors, a systematic, cross-national ranking of their key correlates is lacking. We use interpretable machine learning to quantify the extent to which different climate-relevant outcomes (climate change belief, policy support, willingness to share information on social media, and a pro-environmental behavioral task) are predictable and to rank 19 individual- and nation-level predictors in terms of their importance across 55 countries (<i>N</i> = 4635). We find notable differences in explained variance for the outcomes (e.g., 57% for climate change belief vs. 10% for pro-environmental behavior). Four predictors had consistent effects across all outcomes: environmentalist identity, trust in climate science, internal environmental motivation, and the Human Development Index. However, most of the predictors show divergent patterns, predicting some but not all outcomes or even having opposite effects. To better capture this complexity, future models should include multi-level factors and consider the different contexts (e.g., public vs private) in which climate-related cognition and action emerge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Climate Action
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00251-4
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
37.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning identifies key individual and nation-level factors predicting climate-relevant beliefs and behaviors

Florian Lange, Cameron Brick, Matthew J. Hornsey, Kimberly C Doell et al.
9 citations
npj Climate Action
Climate Change Communication and Perception
37.81
article

Machine learning identifies key individual and nation-level factors predicting climate-relevant beliefs and behaviors

Florian Lange, Cameron Brick, Matthew J. Hornsey, Kimberly C Doell, Madalina Vlasceanu, Boryana Todorova, Samuel Pearson, David Steyrl, Claus Lamm, Jay J. Van Bavel
article en
9 citations

Abstract

While numerous studies have examined factors associated with climate-friendly beliefs and behaviors, a systematic, cross-national ranking of their key correlates is lacking. We use interpretable machine learning to quantify the extent to which different climate-relevant outcomes (climate change belief, policy support, willingness to share information on social media, and a pro-environmental behavioral task) are predictable and to rank 19 individual- and nation-level predictors in terms of their importance across 55 countries (<i>N</i> = 4635). We find notable differences in explained variance for the outcomes (e.g., 57% for climate change belief vs. 10% for pro-environmental behavior). Four predictors had consistent effects across all outcomes: environmentalist identity, trust in climate science, internal environmental motivation, and the Human Development Index. However, most of the predictors show divergent patterns, predicting some but not all outcomes or even having opposite effects. To better capture this complexity, future models should include multi-level factors and consider the different contexts (e.g., public vs private) in which climate-related cognition and action emerge.

npj Climate ActionVol. 4(1)
University of Vienna (AT), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Konstanz (DE), New York University (US), University of Amsterdam (NL), Norwegian School of Economics (NO), KU Leuven (BE)
York University, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Austrian Science Fund, Templeton World Charity Foundation, Australian Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
37.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.