Remote Court Hearings (Past, Present, and Future): Arizona’s Next Steps for a New World to Enhance Access to Justice

In this article, the Arizona Supreme Court COVID-19 Continuity of Court Operations During a Public Health Emergency Workgroup (“Plan B Workgroup”) provides an update from its prior efforts, building on the Post-pandemic Recommendations: COVID-19 Continuity of Court Operations During a Public Health Emergency Workgroup, 75 SMU LAW REVIEW FORUM 1 (2022). This article focuses on the Plan B Workgroup’s February 2022 Recommended Remote and In-Person Hearings in the Arizona State Courts in the Post-Pandemic World and developments after those Recommendations. The article highlights the consideration and adoption of the Recommendations by the Arizona Judicial Council and the Arizona Supreme Court, as well as adaption, adoption, and implementation by Arizona’s trial courts. It then analyzes various surveys regarding remote hearings in 2023 in Arizona, both of members of the State Bar of Arizona and Arizona’s state courts. The article then describes potential next steps for remote court proceedings, including accounting for the fast-changing world of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and its potential for enhancing access to justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SMU Law Review Forum
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25172/slrf.77.1.6
Primary Topic
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote Court Hearings (Past, Present, and Future): Arizona’s Next Steps for a New World to Enhance Access to Justice

Samuel Thumma, Marcus W. Reinkensmeyer
SMU Law Review Forum
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
article

Remote Court Hearings (Past, Present, and Future): Arizona’s Next Steps for a New World to Enhance Access to Justice

Samuel Thumma, Marcus W. Reinkensmeyer
article en

Abstract

In this article, the Arizona Supreme Court COVID-19 Continuity of Court Operations During a Public Health Emergency Workgroup (“Plan B Workgroup”) provides an update from its prior efforts, building on the Post-pandemic Recommendations: COVID-19 Continuity of Court Operations During a Public Health Emergency Workgroup, 75 SMU LAW REVIEW FORUM 1 (2022). This article focuses on the Plan B Workgroup’s February 2022 Recommended Remote and In-Person Hearings in the Arizona State Courts in the Post-Pandemic World and developments after those Recommendations. The article highlights the consideration and adoption of the Recommendations by the Arizona Judicial Council and the Arizona Supreme Court, as well as adaption, adoption, and implementation by Arizona’s trial courts. It then analyzes various surveys regarding remote hearings in 2023 in Arizona, both of members of the State Bar of Arizona and Arizona’s state courts. The article then describes potential next steps for remote court proceedings, including accounting for the fast-changing world of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and its potential for enhancing access to justice.

SMU Law Review ForumVol. 77(1)
Supreme Court of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.