Efficacy of Endovenous Laser Ablation and Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients with Great Saphenous Vein and Perforating Vein Insufficiency

Aim: In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and EVLA combined with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) and outcomes of treatments in patients with great saphenous vein (GSV) and perforating vein (PV) insufficiency. Material and Method: Patients underwent EVLA and EVLA+UGFS at the Interventional Radiology Department of a tertiary referral hospital over a 2-year period were retrospectively analysed. Lower limbs of patients were divided into 2 groups according to the treatment method: lower limbs underwent EVLA (group 1) and EVLA+UGFS (group 2). Before and after the procedures, GSVs and incompetent PVs were assessed by colour Doppler ultrasound. Chronic venous insufficiency symptoms (CVIS): pain, heaviness, night cramps, fatigue, itching, burning sensation, swelling, numbness, tingling and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were assessed before and at 6 months after treatment. Results: The study group included 29 female (69.1%) and 13 male (30.9%) patients with a mean age of 49.8±12.5 years (range, 24-73 years). All treated GSVs and IPVs were occluded at 6 months after procedures. Improvement in one or more CVIS was observed in all limbs. Full recovery in CVIS was 11/38 (28.9%) in group 1 and 2/9 (22.2%) in group 2. No significant difference was found between the two groups in the comparison of the percentage reduction in the rate of full recovery of symptoms (p>0.05). The VAS scores were significantly decreased after procedures in group 1 and 2 (p=0.0001 and 0.007, respectively). The difference in the percentage decrease in VAS scores in the 6th month compared to before treatment was not statistically different between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: EVLA and UGFS are highly effective and reliable treatments for GSV and PV insufficiency. EVLA+UGFS treatments provide similar improvements in CVIS in lower limbs with GSV and PV insufficiency. Patients with lower clinical severity, treatment only for GSV insufficiency may be considered instead of concomitant treatment of GSV insufficiency and PVI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Records
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1658856
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Endovenous Laser Ablation and Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients with Great Saphenous Vein and Perforating Vein Insufficiency

Mehmet Duran, Baki Yağcı, Tuğberk Baştürk
Medical Records
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
article

Efficacy of Endovenous Laser Ablation and Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients with Great Saphenous Vein and Perforating Vein Insufficiency

Mehmet Duran, Baki Yağcı, Tuğberk Baştürk
article en

Abstract

Aim: In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and EVLA combined with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) and outcomes of treatments in patients with great saphenous vein (GSV) and perforating vein (PV) insufficiency. Material and Method: Patients underwent EVLA and EVLA+UGFS at the Interventional Radiology Department of a tertiary referral hospital over a 2-year period were retrospectively analysed. Lower limbs of patients were divided into 2 groups according to the treatment method: lower limbs underwent EVLA (group 1) and EVLA+UGFS (group 2). Before and after the procedures, GSVs and incompetent PVs were assessed by colour Doppler ultrasound. Chronic venous insufficiency symptoms (CVIS): pain, heaviness, night cramps, fatigue, itching, burning sensation, swelling, numbness, tingling and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were assessed before and at 6 months after treatment. Results: The study group included 29 female (69.1%) and 13 male (30.9%) patients with a mean age of 49.8±12.5 years (range, 24-73 years). All treated GSVs and IPVs were occluded at 6 months after procedures. Improvement in one or more CVIS was observed in all limbs. Full recovery in CVIS was 11/38 (28.9%) in group 1 and 2/9 (22.2%) in group 2. No significant difference was found between the two groups in the comparison of the percentage reduction in the rate of full recovery of symptoms (p>0.05). The VAS scores were significantly decreased after procedures in group 1 and 2 (p=0.0001 and 0.007, respectively). The difference in the percentage decrease in VAS scores in the 6th month compared to before treatment was not statistically different between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: EVLA and UGFS are highly effective and reliable treatments for GSV and PV insufficiency. EVLA+UGFS treatments provide similar improvements in CVIS in lower limbs with GSV and PV insufficiency. Patients with lower clinical severity, treatment only for GSV insufficiency may be considered instead of concomitant treatment of GSV insufficiency and PVI.

Medical RecordsVol. 7(2)
Adıyaman University (TR), Usak University (TR), Pamukkale University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.