Microfinance as a Catalyst for Sustainable Development: A Cross-National Comparative Study of the Environmental and Social Impacts

This study examines the role of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in advancing sustainable development by integrating environmental and social objectives into their operations. Using panel data from 30 MFIs across nine countries (2018–2023), the analysis applies Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Instrumental Variables (2SLS), and Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) to assess policy impacts over time. “Access to environmental finance” is used as a validated instrument to address endogeneity. Results show that green lending and environmental risk management significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve gender empowerment. Larger institutions with stronger governance achieve better outcomes, and dynamic models (GMM) confirm the persistence of these effects over time. The findings highlight the importance of regulatory support, green finance infrastructure, and institutional capacity-building for scaling sustainable microfinance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104286
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microfinance as a Catalyst for Sustainable Development: A Cross-National Comparative Study of the Environmental and Social Impacts

Nihel Halouani
3 citations
Sustainability
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
9.39
article

Microfinance as a Catalyst for Sustainable Development: A Cross-National Comparative Study of the Environmental and Social Impacts

Nihel Halouani
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study examines the role of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in advancing sustainable development by integrating environmental and social objectives into their operations. Using panel data from 30 MFIs across nine countries (2018–2023), the analysis applies Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Instrumental Variables (2SLS), and Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) to assess policy impacts over time. “Access to environmental finance” is used as a validated instrument to address endogeneity. Results show that green lending and environmental risk management significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve gender empowerment. Larger institutions with stronger governance achieve better outcomes, and dynamic models (GMM) confirm the persistence of these effects over time. The findings highlight the importance of regulatory support, green finance infrastructure, and institutional capacity-building for scaling sustainable microfinance.

SustainabilityVol. 17(10)
University of Business and Technology (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.