Weekly Rapid Infusion Rituximab Treatment in Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia: Is It Safe and Effective?

Aim: The study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of weekly rapid infusion rituximab in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). Rituximab is widely used for various hematological and autoimmune conditions but can cause infusion-related reactions (IRRs), particularly during initial infusions. Traditional infusion methods are time-consuming and affect hospital stay and healthcare resources. This study aimed to evaluate whether a rapid infusion protocol can address these challenges while maintaining safety and efficacy. Material and Method: This retrospective, single-arm study included 29 patients (22 ITP, 7 AIHA). Patients received rituximab at 375 mg/m² weekly for four doses using a rapid infusion protocol. The primary outcomes were safety and efficacy. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated based on hospital stay duration and resource use. Results: Rapid infusion of rituximab was well tolerated, with only 2 of 116 infusions resulting in Grade 1 IRRs (nausea). No severe adverse reactions were reported. In the ITP group, 66% achieved complete response (CR) and 26% had partial response (PR). In the AIHA group, 50% of patients achieved CR and 50% achieved PR. Post-treatment, the hemoglobin and platelet counts improved significantly. The study also noted reduced hospital stay and healthcare resource utilization. Conclusion: Weekly rapid infusion of rituximab is safe and effective for ITP and AIHA patients and offers advantages in terms of time, cost, and patient comfort. The low incidence of IRRs and high response rates suggest that it could replace the traditional infusion methods. However, larger multicenter studies with long-term follow-up are required to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Records
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1658891
Primary Topic
Blood groups and transfusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weekly Rapid Infusion Rituximab Treatment in Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia: Is It Safe and Effective?

Nermin Keni Beğendi, Mustafa Duran
Medical Records
Blood groups and transfusion
article

Weekly Rapid Infusion Rituximab Treatment in Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia: Is It Safe and Effective?

Nermin Keni Beğendi, Mustafa Duran
article en

Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of weekly rapid infusion rituximab in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). Rituximab is widely used for various hematological and autoimmune conditions but can cause infusion-related reactions (IRRs), particularly during initial infusions. Traditional infusion methods are time-consuming and affect hospital stay and healthcare resources. This study aimed to evaluate whether a rapid infusion protocol can address these challenges while maintaining safety and efficacy. Material and Method: This retrospective, single-arm study included 29 patients (22 ITP, 7 AIHA). Patients received rituximab at 375 mg/m² weekly for four doses using a rapid infusion protocol. The primary outcomes were safety and efficacy. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated based on hospital stay duration and resource use. Results: Rapid infusion of rituximab was well tolerated, with only 2 of 116 infusions resulting in Grade 1 IRRs (nausea). No severe adverse reactions were reported. In the ITP group, 66% achieved complete response (CR) and 26% had partial response (PR). In the AIHA group, 50% of patients achieved CR and 50% achieved PR. Post-treatment, the hemoglobin and platelet counts improved significantly. The study also noted reduced hospital stay and healthcare resource utilization. Conclusion: Weekly rapid infusion of rituximab is safe and effective for ITP and AIHA patients and offers advantages in terms of time, cost, and patient comfort. The low incidence of IRRs and high response rates suggest that it could replace the traditional infusion methods. However, larger multicenter studies with long-term follow-up are required to confirm these findings.

Medical RecordsVol. 7(2)
Universidad CES (CO), Afyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Blood groups and transfusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.