Competition and Reward Practices: Evidence from Public Schools

ABSTRACT We examine the relationship between competition and reward practices in the public education sector. We hypothesize and find that school principals who face more intense competition make greater use of performance-based financial rewards and apply greater differentiation in its distribution between higher versus lower performing teachers. However, we do not find similar evidence for nonfinancial rewards. Further analyses suggest that financial rewards help attract and retain teachers in the face of competition. We also hypothesize and find that, as competition intensifies, principals direct incentives toward student outcomes that are easier to measure and communicate (student achievement) as well as their key determinant (teacher competence), relative to outcomes that are harder to measure and communicate (student well-being and engagement). Our findings suggest that school principals view financial incentives as effective for gaining a competitive edge and that competition can influence the relative importance they place on different student outcomes. JEL Classifications: M41; M50; H75.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Accounting Review
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2024-0041
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competition and Reward Practices: Evidence from Public Schools

Yile Jiang, Sujay Nair
2 citations
The Accounting Review
Merger and Competition Analysis
6.26
article

Competition and Reward Practices: Evidence from Public Schools

Yile Jiang, Sujay Nair
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We examine the relationship between competition and reward practices in the public education sector. We hypothesize and find that school principals who face more intense competition make greater use of performance-based financial rewards and apply greater differentiation in its distribution between higher versus lower performing teachers. However, we do not find similar evidence for nonfinancial rewards. Further analyses suggest that financial rewards help attract and retain teachers in the face of competition. We also hypothesize and find that, as competition intensifies, principals direct incentives toward student outcomes that are easier to measure and communicate (student achievement) as well as their key determinant (teacher competence), relative to outcomes that are harder to measure and communicate (student well-being and engagement). Our findings suggest that school principals view financial incentives as effective for gaining a competitive edge and that competition can influence the relative importance they place on different student outcomes. JEL Classifications: M41; M50; H75.

The Accounting ReviewVol. 100(5)
The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Department of Education and Training
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Merger and Competition Analysis
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Competition and Reward Practices: Evidence from Public Schools — Yile Jiang, Sujay Nair · The Accounting Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS