Development of dietetic staffing requirements for adult intestinal failure services using a best‐practice model

Use of a bottom-up methodology allows calculation of staffing to meet best practice. Proposed dietetic staffing levels obtained from this study are far greater than current allocated staffing within the Australian adult CIF setting. Adequate dietetic resourcing may reduce patient complications and improve quality of life, resulting in enhanced patient and clinical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11308
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of dietetic staffing requirements for adult intestinal failure services using a best‐practice model

Brooke Chapman, Sharon Carey, Emma Osland
1 citations
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
1.12
article

Development of dietetic staffing requirements for adult intestinal failure services using a best‐practice model

Brooke Chapman, Sharon Carey, Emma Osland
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Use of a bottom-up methodology allows calculation of staffing to meet best practice. Proposed dietetic staffing levels obtained from this study are far greater than current allocated staffing within the Australian adult CIF setting. Adequate dietetic resourcing may reduce patient complications and improve quality of life, resulting in enhanced patient and clinical outcomes.

Nutrition in Clinical PracticeVol. 40(5)
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Austin Health (AU)
University of Sydney, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
1.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.