The neurotechnology patent landscape in a time of neuroethics

Patents in the domain of neurotechnology encompass a wide range of advances in imaging and modulation, with applications spanning healthcare, recreation, marketing, and education. As the number of neurotechnology patent applications filed annually continues to multiply, the importance of responsible innovation and anticipatory practices to ensure resulting benefits and mitigate potential harms also grows. To date, key ethical principles based on empirical analyses to guide these goals have not yet been fully articulated. Here, a novel method that builds on prior neuroethical approaches to neurotechnology patent characterization is described. Its rigorous application to a broad sample set of United States (US) patents identified ethical concerns of scientific validity, mental privacy, and mental integrity. The results highlight key ethics principles for consideration in the neurotechnology invention-to-commercialization pipeline, and as they may be adapted to other technological domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04757-4
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The neurotechnology patent landscape in a time of neuroethics

Ari Rotenberg, Judy Illes, Stacey Anderson-Redick, Zelma H. T. Kiss
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

The neurotechnology patent landscape in a time of neuroethics

Ari Rotenberg, Judy Illes, Stacey Anderson-Redick, Zelma H. T. Kiss
article en

Abstract

Patents in the domain of neurotechnology encompass a wide range of advances in imaging and modulation, with applications spanning healthcare, recreation, marketing, and education. As the number of neurotechnology patent applications filed annually continues to multiply, the importance of responsible innovation and anticipatory practices to ensure resulting benefits and mitigate potential harms also grows. To date, key ethical principles based on empirical analyses to guide these goals have not yet been fully articulated. Here, a novel method that builds on prior neuroethical approaches to neurotechnology patent characterization is described. Its rigorous application to a broad sample set of United States (US) patents identified ethical concerns of scientific validity, mental privacy, and mental integrity. The results highlight key ethics principles for consideration in the neurotechnology invention-to-commercialization pipeline, and as they may be adapted to other technological domains.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Calgary (CA), NeuroDevNet (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The neurotechnology patent landscape in a time of neuroethics — Ari Rotenberg, Judy Illes, et al. · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS