A Non-Inferior Randomized Trial of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Compared to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Patients With Hormone-Responsive and HER2-Negative Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer

ObjectivesNeoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) has demonstrated efficacy in postmenopausal patients with hormone-responsive and HER2-negative breast cancer. However, few data are available on NET in premenopausal women. This trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) with NET in premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive, HER2-negative, and lymph node-negative breast cancer.MethodsIn this prospective, randomized study, premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive, HER2-negative, and lymph node-negative breast cancer were recruited. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either NCT or NET with goserelin and tamoxifen, followed by goserelin and anastrozole. The primary purpose was to evaluate the non-inferiority of NET to NCT using a clinical response rate assessed by ultrasound.ResultsA total of 68 patients were assigned to receive either NCT (n = 31) or NET (n = 37). The clinical response rate was 16.1% for NCT and 35.1% for NET (estimated difference 19.0%, 95%CI: -1.1%-39.1%, non-inferior <i>P</i> = 0.002). The rates of breast-conserving surgery were not significantly different between the NCT and NET groups (90.3% vs 83.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.494).ConclusionsA 35.1% clinical response rate was observed in premenopausal patients after NET. However, this study was underpowered to conclude the non-inferiority of NET to NCT because of its early closure.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02535221.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Control
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748251339958
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Non-Inferior Randomized Trial of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Compared to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Patients With Hormone-Responsive and HER2-Negative Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer

Yingjian He, Tao Ouyang, Chongshan Gu, Nan Zhang et al.
Cancer Control
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

A Non-Inferior Randomized Trial of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Compared to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Patients With Hormone-Responsive and HER2-Negative Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer

Yingjian He, Tao Ouyang, Chongshan Gu, Nan Zhang, Zhaoqing Fan, Tianfeng Wang, Tie Fan, Yiqiang Liu, Jinfeng Li
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesNeoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) has demonstrated efficacy in postmenopausal patients with hormone-responsive and HER2-negative breast cancer. However, few data are available on NET in premenopausal women. This trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) with NET in premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive, HER2-negative, and lymph node-negative breast cancer.MethodsIn this prospective, randomized study, premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive, HER2-negative, and lymph node-negative breast cancer were recruited. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either NCT or NET with goserelin and tamoxifen, followed by goserelin and anastrozole. The primary purpose was to evaluate the non-inferiority of NET to NCT using a clinical response rate assessed by ultrasound.ResultsA total of 68 patients were assigned to receive either NCT (n = 31) or NET (n = 37). The clinical response rate was 16.1% for NCT and 35.1% for NET (estimated difference 19.0%, 95%CI: -1.1%-39.1%, non-inferior <i>P</i> = 0.002). The rates of breast-conserving surgery were not significantly different between the NCT and NET groups (90.3% vs 83.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.494).ConclusionsA 35.1% clinical response rate was observed in premenopausal patients after NET. However, this study was underpowered to conclude the non-inferiority of NET to NCT because of its early closure.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02535221.

Cancer ControlVol. 32
Peking University (CN), Peking University Cancer Hospital (CN)
AstraZeneca Schweiz
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.