Applicability of London atlas of tooth development and eruption for dental age estimation in children of the Malaysian population using maxillofacial imaging

In forensics, dental age estimation is crucial, and literature has many methods for estimating dental age. London Atlas of Human Tooth Development and eruption method was developed on British and Bangladeshi populations in 2010, and there are likely to be differences between other populations. Malaysian children have not yet been extensively tested for the method's applicability despite its universal acceptance and reliability. This research aimed to test the applicability of The London Atlas of human tooth development and eruption in children of the Malaysian population aged 4 to 16.99 years old. The study sample included 523 panoramic radiographs of healthy patients who had attended the Dental Paediatrics Department Hospital Tunku Azizah, Malaysia, between May 2019 and December 2019. The intra- and inter-observer errors were analysed by taking 53 radiographs and evaluating them over 14 days using the interclass correlation and Cohen's Kappa index. A paired t-test was used to compare chronological and estimated age ANOVA F-tests were used to establish if the difference is statistically significant between chronological and estimated age. The range of age estimation fell within a year due to the mean absolute difference of 0.60 years. The mean age for estimated age was 9.31±3.18 for the overall sample, 9.06±3.09 for males, and 9.60±3.27 for females. Paired t-test analysis showed the mean difference between chronological and estimated age of -0.0365 and was not statistically significant (p=0.240). The result also showed no statistically significant difference between the sexes. The difference between the chronological and estimated age was underestimated within minimal range, 0.002 years in males and 0.08 years in females. The London Atlas of human tooth development and eruption showed high accuracy in Malaysian children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15046145
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applicability of London atlas of tooth development and eruption for dental age estimation in children of the Malaysian population using maxillofacial imaging

Scheila Mânica, Norhayati Jaffar, Hemlata Pandey, Radhadevi Kuppusamy et al.
PubMed
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
article

Applicability of London atlas of tooth development and eruption for dental age estimation in children of the Malaysian population using maxillofacial imaging

Scheila Mânica, Norhayati Jaffar, Hemlata Pandey, Radhadevi Kuppusamy, Raja Zarina Raja Shahardin
article en

Abstract

In forensics, dental age estimation is crucial, and literature has many methods for estimating dental age. London Atlas of Human Tooth Development and eruption method was developed on British and Bangladeshi populations in 2010, and there are likely to be differences between other populations. Malaysian children have not yet been extensively tested for the method's applicability despite its universal acceptance and reliability. This research aimed to test the applicability of The London Atlas of human tooth development and eruption in children of the Malaysian population aged 4 to 16.99 years old. The study sample included 523 panoramic radiographs of healthy patients who had attended the Dental Paediatrics Department Hospital Tunku Azizah, Malaysia, between May 2019 and December 2019. The intra- and inter-observer errors were analysed by taking 53 radiographs and evaluating them over 14 days using the interclass correlation and Cohen's Kappa index. A paired t-test was used to compare chronological and estimated age ANOVA F-tests were used to establish if the difference is statistically significant between chronological and estimated age. The range of age estimation fell within a year due to the mean absolute difference of 0.60 years. The mean age for estimated age was 9.31±3.18 for the overall sample, 9.06±3.09 for males, and 9.60±3.27 for females. Paired t-test analysis showed the mean difference between chronological and estimated age of -0.0365 and was not statistically significant (p=0.240). The result also showed no statistically significant difference between the sexes. The difference between the chronological and estimated age was underestimated within minimal range, 0.002 years in males and 0.08 years in females. The London Atlas of human tooth development and eruption showed high accuracy in Malaysian children.

PubMedVol. 43(1)
University of Dundee (GB), Hospital Kuala Lumpur (MY), Police Forensic Science Laboratory Dundee (GB), Tun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.