Assessment of the effectiveness of intraoral scanning in patients with maxillary defects: a clinical study.

AIM: The aim was to evaluate the accuracy of an intraoral scanner in obtaining digital scans of maxillary defects and adjacent tissues to fabricate obturator prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten randomly selected patients who required an obturator prosthesis after maxillary resection underwent both conventional and digital impressions. Conventional impressions were obtained using traditional methods, and cast models were prepared. The cast models were digitized using a reference scanner in STL format. For the digital impression group, an intraoral scanner (Trios 5; 3Shape) was used for digital scans and virtual models were created. The data of both groups were analyzed by superimposing predetermined points using reverse engineering software (Geomagic Control; 3D Systems). RESULTS: No significant deviations from normality (P > 0.05) were found in the predetermined points of the residual hard tissue in the STL data. No interaction was observed between the hard tissue components and the impression techniques used. However, accuracy significantly varied between overlapped points in defect parts across the two impression methods (P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: The use of an intraoral scanner for digitally scanning maxillary defects was less effective than conventional impression methods, performing adequately with shallow defects but facing challenges with deeper cavities. It is essential to advance these techniques and conduct clinical studies with larger patient groups to gain broader acceptance of digital impression methods for routine clinical use, particularly for deep defects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b6198699
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the effectiveness of intraoral scanning in patients with maxillary defects: a clinical study.

Bilge Gökçen Röhli̇g, Değer Öngül
PubMed
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

Assessment of the effectiveness of intraoral scanning in patients with maxillary defects: a clinical study.

Bilge Gökçen Röhli̇g, Değer Öngül
article en

Abstract

AIM: The aim was to evaluate the accuracy of an intraoral scanner in obtaining digital scans of maxillary defects and adjacent tissues to fabricate obturator prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten randomly selected patients who required an obturator prosthesis after maxillary resection underwent both conventional and digital impressions. Conventional impressions were obtained using traditional methods, and cast models were prepared. The cast models were digitized using a reference scanner in STL format. For the digital impression group, an intraoral scanner (Trios 5; 3Shape) was used for digital scans and virtual models were created. The data of both groups were analyzed by superimposing predetermined points using reverse engineering software (Geomagic Control; 3D Systems). RESULTS: No significant deviations from normality (P > 0.05) were found in the predetermined points of the residual hard tissue in the STL data. No interaction was observed between the hard tissue components and the impression techniques used. However, accuracy significantly varied between overlapped points in defect parts across the two impression methods (P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: The use of an intraoral scanner for digitally scanning maxillary defects was less effective than conventional impression methods, performing adequately with shallow defects but facing challenges with deeper cavities. It is essential to advance these techniques and conduct clinical studies with larger patient groups to gain broader acceptance of digital impression methods for routine clinical use, particularly for deep defects.

PubMedVol. 29(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.