IMPLEMENTING ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENTS WITH DESIGN THINKING IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION: ENHANCING OUTCOMES FOR BROADLY-DEFINED ENGINEERING PROBLEMS

This study examines the use of alternative assessments, integrated with design thinking, in the Integrated Technology Design Project (ITDP) course to improve engineering education outcomes. Traditional assessments often focus on memorization and theoretical knowledge, abandoning practical skills and real-world problem-solving abilities. Additionally, there is a pressing need for alternative assessment approaches that integrate real-world problem-solving skills, fostering a more holistic and applicable skill set among engineering graduates. To address this issue, the study employs a performance criteria matrix (PCM) aligned with course and program outcomes, focusing on seven (7) broadly-defined engineering problems (SP) and relevant knowledge profiles (SK). All 88 students in the ITDP course are evaluated through four types of PCM for Final Project, Presentation, Assignment and Interim Report. The results indicate high student attainment in key program outcomes, especially in problem analysis, modern tool usage, teamwork, and project management. The alternative assessments fulfilled the ETAC Standard 2020 which is aligned to the Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies (GAPC2021) under the purview of the International Engineering Accords (IEA), effectively promoting practical skills and critical thinking. The study highlights the importance of refining assessment strategies to better align with industry needs and enhance student preparedness for the engineering profession. Future research should explore the new ETAC Standard 2024 requirements via gap analysis, integrating advanced digital tools and simulations, conducting longitudinal studies on the effectiveness of alternative assessments, and increasing industry stakeholder involvement in assessment design. These efforts aim to ensure that assessment strategies remain relevant and effective in preparing graduates for the evolving demands of the engineering field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Modern Education
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35631/ijmoe.724024
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMPLEMENTING ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENTS WITH DESIGN THINKING IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION: ENHANCING OUTCOMES FOR BROADLY-DEFINED ENGINEERING PROBLEMS

Che Maznah Mat Isa, Nurhidayah Azmy
International Journal of Modern Education
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

IMPLEMENTING ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENTS WITH DESIGN THINKING IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION: ENHANCING OUTCOMES FOR BROADLY-DEFINED ENGINEERING PROBLEMS

Che Maznah Mat Isa, Nurhidayah Azmy
article en

Abstract

This study examines the use of alternative assessments, integrated with design thinking, in the Integrated Technology Design Project (ITDP) course to improve engineering education outcomes. Traditional assessments often focus on memorization and theoretical knowledge, abandoning practical skills and real-world problem-solving abilities. Additionally, there is a pressing need for alternative assessment approaches that integrate real-world problem-solving skills, fostering a more holistic and applicable skill set among engineering graduates. To address this issue, the study employs a performance criteria matrix (PCM) aligned with course and program outcomes, focusing on seven (7) broadly-defined engineering problems (SP) and relevant knowledge profiles (SK). All 88 students in the ITDP course are evaluated through four types of PCM for Final Project, Presentation, Assignment and Interim Report. The results indicate high student attainment in key program outcomes, especially in problem analysis, modern tool usage, teamwork, and project management. The alternative assessments fulfilled the ETAC Standard 2020 which is aligned to the Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies (GAPC2021) under the purview of the International Engineering Accords (IEA), effectively promoting practical skills and critical thinking. The study highlights the importance of refining assessment strategies to better align with industry needs and enhance student preparedness for the engineering profession. Future research should explore the new ETAC Standard 2024 requirements via gap analysis, integrating advanced digital tools and simulations, conducting longitudinal studies on the effectiveness of alternative assessments, and increasing industry stakeholder involvement in assessment design. These efforts aim to ensure that assessment strategies remain relevant and effective in preparing graduates for the evolving demands of the engineering field.

International Journal of Modern EducationVol. 7(24)
Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (MY), Hospital Pulau Pinang (MY), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.