Comparison of Endovascular vs Open Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Mortality and Morbidity Outcomes

An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a clinical emergency that involves local expansion of the abdominal aorta. The management of AAA typically involves two surgical approaches: endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR). While both outcome and process measures used in this technique are successful, there is continuing controversy about the relative efficacy of the two approaches concerning mortality and morbidity rates. This meta-analysis is, therefore, designed to provide a structured approach through which the mortality and morbidity rates of EVAR and OSR for AAA can be determined. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically to extract RCTs and observational studies that compare EVAR and OSR. Eligible trials were required to provide data on perioperative mortality, long-term survival, and significant morbidity, including cardiac, pulmonary, and renal events. Two authors conducted data collection and quality assessment, and a meta-analysis was performed using the random effect model due to variation across various studies. Our results indicate that EVAR has postoperative mortality benefits over OSR, though it is unclear how long these benefits will continue to be beneficial. However, due to endoleaks, EVAR is associated with increased incidence of long-term reintervention. In contrast, OSR is more durable than MSR and equals or even surpasses the number of reinterventions. However, it has more excellent rates of perioperative morbidity, such as respiratory or cardiac. In subgroup analysis, age, co-morbidities, and aneurysm characteristics are moderators in the treatment results. This meta-analysis has juxtaposed the benefits of EVAR to the risks of OSR in the management of AAA. The results of this study indicate that the key treatment planning factor is patient-specific, and such a general surgical approach should be applied where skillful professionals are available.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgery and Research
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26502/jsr.10020420
Primary Topic
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Endovascular vs Open Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Mortality and Morbidity Outcomes

Roshneen Ali, Manzoor Ali, Mirza Ali, Aisha Rashid Mohamed Binsultan Alshamsi et al.
Journal of Surgery and Research
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
article

Comparison of Endovascular vs Open Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Mortality and Morbidity Outcomes

Roshneen Ali, Manzoor Ali, Mirza Ali, Aisha Rashid Mohamed Binsultan Alshamsi, Namrah Mahmood, Roda Rashid Bin Sultan Alshamsi, Hanadi Mohamad Al Hussami, Judy Al Hussami, Najla Ebrahim Almansoori, Marwan Y. Abdulkadder
article en

Abstract

An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a clinical emergency that involves local expansion of the abdominal aorta. The management of AAA typically involves two surgical approaches: endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR). While both outcome and process measures used in this technique are successful, there is continuing controversy about the relative efficacy of the two approaches concerning mortality and morbidity rates. This meta-analysis is, therefore, designed to provide a structured approach through which the mortality and morbidity rates of EVAR and OSR for AAA can be determined. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically to extract RCTs and observational studies that compare EVAR and OSR. Eligible trials were required to provide data on perioperative mortality, long-term survival, and significant morbidity, including cardiac, pulmonary, and renal events. Two authors conducted data collection and quality assessment, and a meta-analysis was performed using the random effect model due to variation across various studies. Our results indicate that EVAR has postoperative mortality benefits over OSR, though it is unclear how long these benefits will continue to be beneficial. However, due to endoleaks, EVAR is associated with increased incidence of long-term reintervention. In contrast, OSR is more durable than MSR and equals or even surpasses the number of reinterventions. However, it has more excellent rates of perioperative morbidity, such as respiratory or cardiac. In subgroup analysis, age, co-morbidities, and aneurysm characteristics are moderators in the treatment results. This meta-analysis has juxtaposed the benefits of EVAR to the risks of OSR in the management of AAA. The results of this study indicate that the key treatment planning factor is patient-specific, and such a general surgical approach should be applied where skillful professionals are available.

Journal of Surgery and Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.