Gender and race/ethnicity differences in the predictors of course grade in a first‐year engineering course and continued enrollment in engineering

Abstract Background Engineering requires new solutions to improve undergraduate performance outcomes, including course grades and continued enrollment in engineering pathways. Belonging and engineering role identity have long been associated with successful outcomes in engineering, including academic success, retention, and well‐being. Purpose We measure the relationships between belonging and role identity at the beginning of a first‐year engineering course with course grade and continued enrollment in engineering courses. We test the effect of an ecological belonging intervention on student belonging, course grade, and persistence. Method Students ( n = 834) reported their sense of belonging in engineering, cross‐racial experiences, engineering performance/competence, interest in engineering, and engineering recognition before and after an in‐class intervention to improve classroom belonging ecology. Through a series of longitudinal multigroup path analyses, a form of structural equation modeling, we tested the predictive relationships of the measured constructs with engineering identity and investigated differences in these relationships by student gender and race/ethnicity. Findings The proposed model predicts course grades and continued enrollment, providing insight into the potential for interventions to support first‐year engineering students. Group analysis results demonstrate the difference in the function of these psychosocial measures for women and Black, Latino/a/x, and Indigenous (BLI) students, providing insights into the potential importance of sociocultural interventions within engineering classrooms to improve the engineering climate, engagement, and retention of students. Implications The results highlight the need for more specific, nuanced theoretical investigations of how marginalized students experience the engineering environment and develop social belonging and engineering role identity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering Education
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.70007
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender and race/ethnicity differences in the predictors of course grade in a first‐year engineering course and continued enrollment in engineering

Linda DeAngelo, Allison Godwin, Matthew Bahnson, Kevin R. Binning et al.
4 citations
Journal of Engineering Education
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
4.54
article

Gender and race/ethnicity differences in the predictors of course grade in a first‐year engineering course and continued enrollment in engineering

Linda DeAngelo, Allison Godwin, Matthew Bahnson, Kevin R. Binning, Eric McChesney, Gerard Dorvè‐Lewis, Carlie Cooper
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Engineering requires new solutions to improve undergraduate performance outcomes, including course grades and continued enrollment in engineering pathways. Belonging and engineering role identity have long been associated with successful outcomes in engineering, including academic success, retention, and well‐being. Purpose We measure the relationships between belonging and role identity at the beginning of a first‐year engineering course with course grade and continued enrollment in engineering courses. We test the effect of an ecological belonging intervention on student belonging, course grade, and persistence. Method Students ( n = 834) reported their sense of belonging in engineering, cross‐racial experiences, engineering performance/competence, interest in engineering, and engineering recognition before and after an in‐class intervention to improve classroom belonging ecology. Through a series of longitudinal multigroup path analyses, a form of structural equation modeling, we tested the predictive relationships of the measured constructs with engineering identity and investigated differences in these relationships by student gender and race/ethnicity. Findings The proposed model predicts course grades and continued enrollment, providing insight into the potential for interventions to support first‐year engineering students. Group analysis results demonstrate the difference in the function of these psychosocial measures for women and Black, Latino/a/x, and Indigenous (BLI) students, providing insights into the potential importance of sociocultural interventions within engineering classrooms to improve the engineering climate, engagement, and retention of students. Implications The results highlight the need for more specific, nuanced theoretical investigations of how marginalized students experience the engineering environment and develop social belonging and engineering role identity.

Journal of Engineering EducationVol. 114(3)
University of Georgia (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Cornell University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
4.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.