Optimization of Quality Management in Quality Based Curriculum Development

Evaluation is a crucial component in the development and implementation of quality-based curricula. This study explores the effectiveness of various evaluation methods, including formative, summative, and authentic assessments, in measuring curriculum success. The results indicate that formative assessment positively contributes to students' understanding, while summative assessments often fail to accurately reflect students' abilities. Authentic assessments have proven to enhance student motivation and preparedness for real-world challenges. Student involvement in the evaluation process, the use of evaluation data for continuous improvement, and teacher training in diverse evaluation methods are key factors in enhancing evaluation effectiveness. This research emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate evaluation methods aligned with curriculum objectives to achieve optimal educational outcomes. Thus, the findings provide valuable insights for curriculum development and evaluation practices in educational institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
LITERACY International Scientific Journals of Social Education Humanities
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56910/literacy.v4i1.1983
Primary Topic
School Leadership and Teacher Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of Quality Management in Quality Based Curriculum Development

Titi Hendrawati, Sudarma Sudarma
LITERACY International Scientific Journals of Social Education Humanities
School Leadership and Teacher Performance
article

Optimization of Quality Management in Quality Based Curriculum Development

Titi Hendrawati, Sudarma Sudarma
article en

Abstract

Evaluation is a crucial component in the development and implementation of quality-based curricula. This study explores the effectiveness of various evaluation methods, including formative, summative, and authentic assessments, in measuring curriculum success. The results indicate that formative assessment positively contributes to students' understanding, while summative assessments often fail to accurately reflect students' abilities. Authentic assessments have proven to enhance student motivation and preparedness for real-world challenges. Student involvement in the evaluation process, the use of evaluation data for continuous improvement, and teacher training in diverse evaluation methods are key factors in enhancing evaluation effectiveness. This research emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate evaluation methods aligned with curriculum objectives to achieve optimal educational outcomes. Thus, the findings provide valuable insights for curriculum development and evaluation practices in educational institutions.

LITERACY International Scientific Journals of Social Education HumanitiesVol. 4(1)
President University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
School Leadership and Teacher Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimization of Quality Management in Quality Based Curriculum Development — Titi Hendrawati, Sudarma Sudarma · LITERACY International Scientific Journals of Social Education Humanities (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS