Red flags for remote cognitive diagnostic assessment: A Delphi expert consensus study by the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging

Despite the potential benefits of remote cognitive assessment for dementia, it is not appropriate for all clinical encounters. Our aim was to develop guidance on determining a patient's suitability for comprehensive remote cognitive diagnostic assessment for dementia. A multidisciplinary expert workgroup was convened under the auspices of the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging. We applied the Delphi method to determine 'red flags' for remote cognitive assessment of dementia. This resulted in 14 red flags that met the predetermined consensus criteria. We then developed a novel clinical decision-making infographic that integrated these findings to support multidisciplinary clinicians in determining a patient's readiness to undergo comprehensive remote cognitive assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251338186
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Red flags for remote cognitive diagnostic assessment: A Delphi expert consensus study by the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging

Morris Freedman, Zahinoor Ismail, Vladimir Khanassov, John D. Fisk et al.
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Delphi Technique in Research
article

Red flags for remote cognitive diagnostic assessment: A Delphi expert consensus study by the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging

Morris Freedman, Zahinoor Ismail, Vladimir Khanassov, John D. Fisk, Alexandre Henri‐Bhargava, Paula McLaughlin, Maiya R. Geddes, Philippe Desmarais, Jacqueline A. Pettersen, Richard Camicioli, Megan E. O’Connell, Howard Chertkow, Inbal Itzhak, Linda Lee, Nathan Friedman, Sophie Hallot
article en

Abstract

Despite the potential benefits of remote cognitive assessment for dementia, it is not appropriate for all clinical encounters. Our aim was to develop guidance on determining a patient's suitability for comprehensive remote cognitive diagnostic assessment for dementia. A multidisciplinary expert workgroup was convened under the auspices of the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging. We applied the Delphi method to determine 'red flags' for remote cognitive assessment of dementia. This resulted in 14 red flags that met the predetermined consensus criteria. We then developed a novel clinical decision-making infographic that integrated these findings to support multidisciplinary clinicians in determining a patient's readiness to undergo comprehensive remote cognitive assessment.

Journal of Alzheimer s DiseaseVol. 106(2)
Northeastern University (US), Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA), Dalhousie University (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Northern British Columbia (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), University of Exeter (GB), Jewish General Hospital (CA), Nova Scotia Health Authority (CA), Baycrest Hospital (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility (GB), Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA), Centre for Family Medicine (CA), McGill University (CA), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), McMaster University (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.